Core i5-1035G4 vs Xeon D-1813NT

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-1035G4 vs Xeon D-1813NT FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-1035G4 vs Xeon D-1813NT: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-1035G4

2019

Why buy it

✅Draws 15W instead of 42W, a 27W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Plus Graphics G4, while Xeon D-1813NT needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (7,658 vs 7,732).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 10 MB).

Xeon D-1813NT

2023

Why buy it

✅+1% higher PassMark.
✅+66.7% larger total L3 cache (10 MB vs 6 MB).

Trade-offs

❌180% higher power demand at 42W vs 15W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-1035G4 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon D-1813NT better than Core i5-1035G4?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon D-1813NT makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-1035G4 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon D-1813NT is the stronger fit. You are getting 1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 66.7% larger total L3 cache (10 MB vs 6 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon D-1813NT still makes the most sense overall. Xeon D-1813NT comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 1% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon D-1813NT makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2019), 66.7% larger total L3 cache (10 MB vs 6 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i5-1035G4 vs Xeon D-1813NT Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-1035G4

The Core i5-1035G4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Ice Lake (Client) (2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1526. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 7,658 points. Launch price was $320.

Xeon D-1813NT

The Xeon D-1813NT is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 10240 kB. Socket: FCBGA2227. Thermal design power (TDP): 42 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 7,732 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i5-1035G4 and Xeon D-1813NT share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Core i5-1035G4 versus 2.4 GHz on the Xeon D-1813NT — a 42.6% clock advantage for the Core i5-1035G4 (base: 1.1 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Core i5-1035G4 is built on the Ice Lake (Client) (2019) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i5-1035G4 scores 7,658 against the Xeon D-1813NT's 7,732 — a 1% lead for the Xeon D-1813NT. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i5-1035G4 vs 10240 kB on the Xeon D-1813NT.

Feature	Core i5-1035G4	Xeon D-1813NT
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	4 / 8
Boost Clock	3.7 GHz+54%	2.4 GHz
Base Clock	1.1 GHz	2.2 GHz+100%
L3 Cache	6 MB (total)	10240 kB+67%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	—
Process	10 nm	—
Architecture	Ice Lake (Client) (2019)	—
PassMark	7,658	7,732
Cinebench R23 Multi	4,332	—
Geekbench 6 Single	922	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	2,919	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-1035G4 uses the FCBGA1526 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon D-1813NT uses FCBGA2227 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i5-1035G4	Xeon D-1813NT
Socket	FCBGA1526	FCBGA2227
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200, LPDDR4-3733	—
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-1035G4) / not specified (Xeon D-1813NT). The Core i5-1035G4 includes integrated graphics (Iris Plus Graphics G4), while the Xeon D-1813NT requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-1035G4 targets Ultra-portable laptops. Direct competitor: Core i5-1035G4 rivals Ryzen 5 3500U.