Core i5-1035G4 vs Xeon E5-1630 v4

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-1035G4 vs Xeon E5-1630 v4 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-1035G4 vs Xeon E5-1630 v4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-1035G4

2019

Why buy it

✅+1.3% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 15W instead of 140W, a 125W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Plus Graphics G4, while Xeon E5-1630 v4 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-1630 v4 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 10 MB).

Xeon E5-1630 v4

2016

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +12.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+66.7% larger total L3 cache (10 MB vs 6 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (7,561 vs 7,658).
❌833.3% higher power demand at 140W vs 15W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-1035G4 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-1035G4 better than Xeon E5-1630 v4?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-1630 v4 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-1035G4 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-1035G4 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.3% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-1035G4 still makes the most sense overall. Core i5-1035G4 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 1.3% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-1035G4 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2016) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i5-1035G4 vs Xeon E5-1630 v4 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-1035G4

The Core i5-1035G4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Ice Lake (Client) (2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1526. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 7,658 points. Launch price was $320.

Xeon E5-1630 v4

The Xeon E5-1630 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell-EP (2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 10 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 7,561 points. Launch price was $406.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i5-1035G4 and Xeon E5-1630 v4 share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Core i5-1035G4 versus 4 GHz on the Xeon E5-1630 v4 — a 7.8% clock advantage for the Xeon E5-1630 v4 (base: 1.1 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The Core i5-1035G4 uses the Ice Lake (Client) (2019) architecture (10 nm), while the Xeon E5-1630 v4 uses Broadwell-EP (2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-1035G4 scores 7,658 against the Xeon E5-1630 v4's 7,561 — a 1.3% lead for the Core i5-1035G4. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i5-1035G4 vs 10 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-1630 v4.

Feature	Core i5-1035G4	Xeon E5-1630 v4
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	4 / 8
Boost Clock	3.7 GHz	4 GHz+8%
Base Clock	1.1 GHz	3.7 GHz+236%
L3 Cache	6 MB (total)	10 MB (total)+67%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	256K (per core)
Process	10 nm-29%	14 nm
Architecture	Ice Lake (Client) (2019)	Broadwell-EP (2016)
PassMark	7,658+1%	7,561
Cinebench R23 Multi	4,332	—
Geekbench 6 Single	922	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	2,919	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-1035G4 uses the FCBGA1526 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-1630 v4 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i5-1035G4	Xeon E5-1630 v4
Socket	FCBGA1526	LGA2011
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200, LPDDR4-3733	—
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-1035G4) / not specified (Xeon E5-1630 v4). The Core i5-1035G4 includes integrated graphics (Iris Plus Graphics G4), while the Xeon E5-1630 v4 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-1035G4 targets Ultra-portable laptops. Direct competitor: Core i5-1035G4 rivals Ryzen 5 3500U.