PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-10400F

2020

Why buy it

✅Costs $182 less on MSRP ($160 MSRP vs $342 MSRP).
✅Delivers 23.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 81.4 vs 66.1 PassMark/$ ($160 MSRP vs $342 MSRP).
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i5-13500T.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13500T across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (8,191 vs 11,028).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 24 MB).
❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Core i5-13500T moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Core i5-13500T

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +32.5% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 12 MB).
✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
✅25% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 66.1 vs 81.4 PassMark/$ ($342 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.

Core i5-10400F

2020

Core i5-13500T

2023

Why buy it

✅Costs $182 less on MSRP ($160 MSRP vs $342 MSRP).
✅Delivers 23.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 81.4 vs 66.1 PassMark/$ ($160 MSRP vs $342 MSRP).
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i5-13500T.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +32.5% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 12 MB).
✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
✅25% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13500T across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (8,191 vs 11,028).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 24 MB).
❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Core i5-13500T moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 66.1 vs 81.4 PassMark/$ ($342 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-13500T better than Core i5-10400F?

Yes. Core i5-13500T is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 32.5% average FPS lead across 2 shared CPU game tests in our data, 34.6% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, 73.6% higher PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-13500T is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 32.5% more average FPS across 2 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-13500T is the better fit. You are getting 34.6% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 14 cores and 20 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 12 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-13500T is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i5-10400F makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Core i5-13500T is 113.8% more expensive on MSRP at $342 MSRP versus $160 MSRP, and it gives you a 32.5% average FPS lead across 2 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-10400F is also 23.1% better value on MSRP (81.4 vs 66.1 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper. That said, if you already own a compatible LGA1200 + DDR4 setup, Core i5-10400F can still make sense as a platform-matched option because it avoids a motherboard and RAM swap.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-13500T is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2020), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of LGA1200, 100% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 12 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 14 cores / 20 threads instead of 6/12. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i5-10400F Benchmark Check

Core i5-13500T Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Core i5-13500T
1080p
low	192 FPS	172 FPS
medium	152 FPS	160 FPS
high	123 FPS	134 FPS
ultra	100 FPS	113 FPS
1440p
low	153 FPS	143 FPS
medium	119 FPS	124 FPS
high	97 FPS	99 FPS
ultra	79 FPS	84 FPS
4K
low	82 FPS	81 FPS
medium	70 FPS	75 FPS
high	55 FPS	60 FPS
ultra	43 FPS	46 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Core i5-13500T

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Core i5-13500T
1080p
low	326 FPS	305 FPS
medium	318 FPS	260 FPS
high	290 FPS	220 FPS
ultra	253 FPS	201 FPS
1440p
low	326 FPS	257 FPS
medium	292 FPS	227 FPS
high	267 FPS	197 FPS
ultra	234 FPS	172 FPS
4K
low	309 FPS	159 FPS
medium	258 FPS	142 FPS
high	235 FPS	134 FPS
ultra	199 FPS	119 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Core i5-13500T

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Core i5-13500T
1080p
low	326 FPS	530 FPS
medium	326 FPS	450 FPS
high	326 FPS	416 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	375 FPS
1440p
low	326 FPS	492 FPS
medium	326 FPS	423 FPS
high	326 FPS	383 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	344 FPS
4K
low	326 FPS	393 FPS
medium	326 FPS	331 FPS
high	289 FPS	296 FPS
ultra	229 FPS	246 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Core i5-13500T

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Core i5-13500T
1080p
low	326 FPS	566 FPS
medium	326 FPS	566 FPS
high	326 FPS	566 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	566 FPS
1440p
low	326 FPS	566 FPS
medium	326 FPS	566 FPS
high	326 FPS	566 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	507 FPS
4K
low	326 FPS	528 FPS
medium	326 FPS	481 FPS
high	326 FPS	427 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	373 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Core i5-13500T

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-10400F and Core i5-13500T

Core i5-10400F

The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.

Core i5-13500T

The Core i5-13500T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 22,622 points. Launch price was $232.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-10400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Core i5-13500T offers 14 cores / 20 threads — the Core i5-13500T has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F versus 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13500T — a 6.7% clock advantage for the Core i5-13500T (base: 2.9 GHz vs 1.6 GHz). The Core i5-10400F uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i5-13500T uses Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-10400F scores 13,029 against the Core i5-13500T's 22,622 — a 53.8% lead for the Core i5-13500T. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 8,191 vs 11,028 (29.5% advantage for the Core i5-13500T). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,454 vs 2,278, a 44.2% lead for the Core i5-13500T that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 5,783 vs 9,900 (52.5% advantage for the Core i5-13500T). L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F vs 24 MB (total) on the Core i5-13500T.

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Core i5-13500T
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	14 / 20+133%
Boost Clock	4.3 GHz	4.6 GHz+7%
Base Clock	2.9 GHz+81%	1.6 GHz
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)	24 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	1.25 MB (per core)+400%
Process	14 nm	Intel 7 nm-50%
Architecture	Comet Lake (2020−2025)	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
PassMark	13,029	22,622+74%
Cinebench R23 Multi	8,191	11,028+35%
Geekbench 6 Single	1,454	2,278+57%
Geekbench 6 Multi	5,783	9,900+71%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-10400F uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-13500T uses LGA1700 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Core i5-10400F versus DDR5-4800 on the Core i5-13500T — the Core i5-13500T supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-13500T supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i5-10400F) vs 20 (Core i5-13500T) — the Core i5-13500T offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Core i5-10400F) and 600-series,700-series (Core i5-13500T).

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Core i5-13500T
Socket	LGA1200	LGA1700
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 5.0+67%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666	DDR5-4800+25%
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	192 GB+50%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16	20+25%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. The Core i5-13500T includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 770), while the Core i5-10400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming, Core i5-13500T targets Productivity. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600; Core i5-13500T rivals Ryzen 7 5700X.

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Core i5-13500T
Integrated GPU	No	Yes
IGPU Model	—	UHD Graphics 770
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	Gaming	Productivity

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i5-10400F launched at $160 MSRP, while the Core i5-13500T debuted at $342. On MSRP ($160 vs $342), the Core i5-10400F is $182 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-10400F delivers 81.4 pts/$ vs 66.1 pts/$ for the Core i5-13500T — making the Core i5-10400F the 20.7% better value option.