
Core i5-10400F
Popular choices:

Core i5-14490F
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-10400F
2020Why buy it
- ✅+226.3% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
- ✅Costs $49 less on MSRP ($160 MSRP vs $209 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-14490F across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 24 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 81.4 vs 132.2 PassMark/$ ($160 MSRP vs $209 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Core i5-14490F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Core i5-14490F
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +87.2% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Delivers 62.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 132.2 vs 81.4 PassMark/$ ($209 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
- ✅25% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (2,510 vs 8,191).
- ❌30.6% HIGHER MSRP$209 MSRPvs$160 MSRP
Core i5-10400F
2020Core i5-14490F
2024Why buy it
- ✅+226.3% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
- ✅Costs $49 less on MSRP ($160 MSRP vs $209 MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +87.2% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Delivers 62.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 132.2 vs 81.4 PassMark/$ ($209 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
- ✅25% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-14490F across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 24 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 81.4 vs 132.2 PassMark/$ ($160 MSRP vs $209 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Core i5-14490F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (2,510 vs 8,191).
- ❌30.6% HIGHER MSRP$209 MSRPvs$160 MSRP
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-14490F better than Core i5-10400F?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-10400F | Core i5-14490F |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 192 FPS | 246 FPS |
| medium | 152 FPS | 231 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 196 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 169 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 215 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 183 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 151 FPS |
| ultra | 79 FPS | 132 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 82 FPS | 149 FPS |
| medium | 70 FPS | 127 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 86 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-10400F | Core i5-14490F |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 645 FPS |
| medium | 318 FPS | 549 FPS |
| high | 290 FPS | 464 FPS |
| ultra | 253 FPS | 411 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 555 FPS |
| medium | 292 FPS | 493 FPS |
| high | 267 FPS | 418 FPS |
| ultra | 234 FPS | 352 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 309 FPS | 326 FPS |
| medium | 258 FPS | 293 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 279 FPS |
| ultra | 199 FPS | 238 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-10400F | Core i5-14490F |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 691 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 691 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 691 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 691 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 691 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 691 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 691 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 656 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 596 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 502 FPS |
| high | 289 FPS | 447 FPS |
| ultra | 229 FPS | 376 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-10400F | Core i5-14490F |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 691 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 691 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 691 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 691 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 691 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 691 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 691 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 592 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 661 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 585 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 514 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 436 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-10400F and Core i5-14490F

Core i5-10400F
Core i5-10400F
The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.

Core i5-14490F
Core i5-14490F
The Core i5-14490F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Janeiro 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 27,621 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i5-10400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Core i5-14490F offers 10 cores / 16 threads — the Core i5-14490F has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F versus 5 GHz on the Core i5-14490F — a 15.1% clock advantage for the Core i5-14490F (base: 2.9 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core i5-10400F uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i5-14490F uses Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-10400F scores 13,029 against the Core i5-14490F's 27,621 — a 71.8% lead for the Core i5-14490F. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 8,191 vs 2,510 (106.2% advantage for the Core i5-10400F). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,454 vs 2,600, a 56.5% lead for the Core i5-14490F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 5,783 vs 12,000 (69.9% advantage for the Core i5-14490F). L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F vs 24 MB (total) on the Core i5-14490F.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Core i5-14490F |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 10 / 16+67% |
| Boost Clock | 4.3 GHz | 5 GHz+16% |
| Base Clock | 2.9 GHz+16% | 2.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 24 MB (total)+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core)+400% |
| Process | 14 nm | 10 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Comet Lake (2020−2025) | Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) |
| PassMark | 13,029 | 27,621+112% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 8,191+226% | 2,510 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,454 | 2,600+79% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 5,783 | 12,000+108% |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-10400F uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-14490F uses LGA1700 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Core i5-10400F versus DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-14490F — the Core i5-14490F supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-14490F supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i5-10400F) vs 20 (Core i5-14490F) — the Core i5-14490F offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Core i5-10400F) and H610,B660,Z690,B760,Z790 (Core i5-14490F).
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Core i5-14490F |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1200 | LGA1700 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 5.0+67% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200+25% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 192 GB+50% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 20+25% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming, Core i5-14490F targets Mid-Range. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600; Core i5-14490F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Core i5-14490F |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Gaming | Mid-Range |
Value Analysis
The Core i5-10400F launched at $160 MSRP, while the Core i5-14490F debuted at $209. On MSRP ($160 vs $209), the Core i5-10400F is $49 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-10400F delivers 81.4 pts/$ vs 132.2 pts/$ for the Core i5-14490F — making the Core i5-14490F the 47.5% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Core i5-14490F |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $160-23% | $209 |
| Performance per Dollar | 81.4 | 132.2+62% |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2024 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












