Core i5-10400F vs Core i5-14490F

Intel

Core i5-10400F

6 Cores12 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.3 GHz2020

Popular choices:

VS
Intel

Core i5-14490F

10 Cores16 Thrd65 WWMax: 5 GHz2024

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-10400F

2020

Why buy it

  • +226.3% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
  • Costs $49 less on MSRP ($160 MSRP vs $209 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-14490F across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 24 MB).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 81.4 vs 132.2 PassMark/$ ($160 MSRP vs $209 MSRP).
  • Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Core i5-14490F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Core i5-14490F

2024

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +87.2% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +100% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 12 MB).
  • Delivers 62.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 132.2 vs 81.4 PassMark/$ ($209 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
  • Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
  • 25% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (2,510 vs 8,191).
  • 30.6% HIGHER MSRP
    $209 MSRPvs$160 MSRP

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-14490F better than Core i5-10400F?
It depends on what matters more to you. For gaming, Core i5-14490F is ahead with a 87.2% average FPS lead across 3 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-10400F pulls ahead with 226.3% better Cinebench R23 multi-core. Core i5-14490F also has the bigger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 12 MB).
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-10400F is the better fit. You are getting 226.3% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i5-14490F is the smarter buy today. Core i5-14490F is 30.6% more expensive on MSRP at $209 MSRP versus $160 MSRP, and it gives you a 87.2% average FPS lead across 3 shared CPU game tests in our data. The trade-off is that Core i5-10400F is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 226.3% better Cinebench R23 multi-core. It is also 62.3% better value on MSRP (132.2 vs 81.4 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper. That said, if you already own a compatible LGA1200 + DDR4 setup, Core i5-10400F can still make sense as a platform-matched option because it avoids a motherboard and RAM swap.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-14490F is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2020), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of LGA1200, and 100% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 12 MB). That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetCore i5-10400FCore i5-14490F
1080p
low192 FPS246 FPS
medium152 FPS231 FPS
high123 FPS196 FPS
ultra100 FPS169 FPS
1440p
low153 FPS215 FPS
medium119 FPS183 FPS
high97 FPS151 FPS
ultra79 FPS132 FPS
4K
low82 FPS149 FPS
medium70 FPS127 FPS
high55 FPS98 FPS
ultra43 FPS86 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetCore i5-10400FCore i5-14490F
1080p
low326 FPS645 FPS
medium318 FPS549 FPS
high290 FPS464 FPS
ultra253 FPS411 FPS
1440p
low326 FPS555 FPS
medium292 FPS493 FPS
high267 FPS418 FPS
ultra234 FPS352 FPS
4K
low309 FPS326 FPS
medium258 FPS293 FPS
high235 FPS279 FPS
ultra199 FPS238 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetCore i5-10400FCore i5-14490F
1080p
low326 FPS691 FPS
medium326 FPS691 FPS
high326 FPS691 FPS
ultra326 FPS691 FPS
1440p
low326 FPS691 FPS
medium326 FPS691 FPS
high326 FPS691 FPS
ultra326 FPS656 FPS
4K
low326 FPS596 FPS
medium326 FPS502 FPS
high289 FPS447 FPS
ultra229 FPS376 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetCore i5-10400FCore i5-14490F
1080p
low326 FPS691 FPS
medium326 FPS691 FPS
high326 FPS691 FPS
ultra326 FPS691 FPS
1440p
low326 FPS691 FPS
medium326 FPS691 FPS
high326 FPS691 FPS
ultra326 FPS592 FPS
4K
low326 FPS661 FPS
medium326 FPS585 FPS
high326 FPS514 FPS
ultra326 FPS436 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-10400F and Core i5-14490F

Intel

Core i5-10400F

The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.

Intel

Core i5-14490F

The Core i5-14490F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Janeiro 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 27,621 points. Launch price was $299.

Processing Power

The Core i5-10400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Core i5-14490F offers 10 cores / 16 threads — the Core i5-14490F has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F versus 5 GHz on the Core i5-14490F — a 15.1% clock advantage for the Core i5-14490F (base: 2.9 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core i5-10400F uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i5-14490F uses Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-10400F scores 13,029 against the Core i5-14490F's 27,621 — a 71.8% lead for the Core i5-14490F. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 8,191 vs 2,510 (106.2% advantage for the Core i5-10400F). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,454 vs 2,600, a 56.5% lead for the Core i5-14490F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 5,783 vs 12,000 (69.9% advantage for the Core i5-14490F). L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F vs 24 MB (total) on the Core i5-14490F.

FeatureCore i5-10400FCore i5-14490F
Cores / Threads
6 / 12
10 / 16+67%
Boost Clock
4.3 GHz
5 GHz+16%
Base Clock
2.9 GHz+16%
2.5 GHz
L3 Cache
12 MB (total)
24 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
1.25 MB (per core)+400%
Process
14 nm
10 nm-29%
Architecture
Comet Lake (2020−2025)
Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025)
PassMark
13,029
27,621+112%
Cinebench R23 Multi
8,191+226%
2,510
Geekbench 6 Single
1,454
2,600+79%
Geekbench 6 Multi
5,783
12,000+108%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-10400F uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-14490F uses LGA1700 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Core i5-10400F versus DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-14490F — the Core i5-14490F supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-14490F supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i5-10400F) vs 20 (Core i5-14490F) — the Core i5-14490F offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Core i5-10400F) and H610,B660,Z690,B760,Z790 (Core i5-14490F).

FeatureCore i5-10400FCore i5-14490F
Socket
LGA1200
LGA1700
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 5.0+67%
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2666
DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200+25%
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB
192 GB+50%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
No
No
PCIe Lanes
16
20+25%
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming, Core i5-14490F targets Mid-Range. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600; Core i5-14490F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.

FeatureCore i5-10400FCore i5-14490F
Integrated GPU
No
No
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Gaming
Mid-Range
💰

Value Analysis

The Core i5-10400F launched at $160 MSRP, while the Core i5-14490F debuted at $209. On MSRP ($160 vs $209), the Core i5-10400F is $49 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-10400F delivers 81.4 pts/$ vs 132.2 pts/$ for the Core i5-14490F — making the Core i5-14490F the 47.5% better value option.

FeatureCore i5-10400FCore i5-14490F
MSRP
$160-23%
$209
Performance per Dollar
81.4
132.2+62%
Release Date
2020
2024