PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-10400F vs Core i7-10700K FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-10400F vs Core i7-10700K: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-10400F

2020

Why buy it

✅Costs $227 less on MSRP ($160 MSRP vs $387 MSRP).
✅Delivers 69.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 81.4 vs 48.0 PassMark/$ ($160 MSRP vs $387 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i7-10700K.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-10700K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (8,191 vs 14,144).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-10700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i7-10700K

2020

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +40.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Core i5-10400F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 48.0 vs 81.4 PassMark/$ ($387 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
❌92.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 65W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-10700K better than Core i5-10400F?

Yes. Core i7-10700K is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 40.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 72.7% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, 42.5% higher PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-10700K is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 40.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-10700K is the stronger fit. You are getting 72.7% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-10700K is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i5-10400F is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Core i7-10700K comes in 141.9% more expensive on MSRP at $387 MSRP versus $160 MSRP, and it still gives you a 40.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-10400F is also 69.8% better value on MSRP (81.4 vs 48.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-10700K makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB) and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 6/12. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i5-10400F vs Core i7-10700K Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-10400F

The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.

Core i7-10700K

The Core i7-10700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 18,561 points. Launch price was $400.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-10400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Core i7-10700K offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i7-10700K has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F versus 5.1 GHz on the Core i7-10700K — a 17% clock advantage for the Core i7-10700K (base: 2.9 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). Both are built on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture using a 14 nm process. In PassMark, the Core i5-10400F scores 13,029 against the Core i7-10700K's 18,561 — a 35% lead for the Core i7-10700K. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 8,191 vs 14,144 (53.3% advantage for the Core i7-10700K). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,454 vs 1,290, a 12% lead for the Core i5-10400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 5,783 vs 8,404 (36.9% advantage for the Core i7-10700K). L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F vs 16 MB (total) on the Core i7-10700K.

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Core i7-10700K
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	8 / 16+33%
Boost Clock	4.3 GHz	5.1 GHz+19%
Base Clock	2.9 GHz	3.8 GHz+31%
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)	16 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	256K (per core)
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Comet Lake (2020−2025)	Comet Lake (2020−2025)
PassMark	13,029	18,561+42%
Cinebench R23 Multi	8,191	14,144+73%
Geekbench 6 Single	1,454+13%	1,290
Geekbench 6 Multi	5,783	8,404+45%

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the LGA1200 socket with PCIe 3.0. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Core i5-10400F versus DDR4-2933 on the Core i7-10700K — the Core i7-10700K supports 10% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Core i5-10400F) and Intel 400 Series,Intel 500 Series (Core i7-10700K).

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Core i7-10700K
Socket	LGA1200	LGA1200
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666	DDR4-2933+10%
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	128 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Core i7-10700K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F) vs Yes (Core i7-10700K). The Core i7-10700K includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Core i5-10400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming, Core i7-10700K targets Gaming/Workstation. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600; Core i7-10700K rivals Ryzen 7 3700X.

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Core i7-10700K
Integrated GPU	No	Yes
IGPU Model	—	UHD Graphics 630
Unlocked	No	Yes
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	Yes
Target Use	Gaming	Gaming/Workstation

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i5-10400F was priced at $160, while the Core i7-10700K came in at $387. On launch pricing ($160 vs $387), Core i5-10400F was $227 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-10400F delivers 81.4 pts/$ vs 48.0 pts/$ for the Core i7-10700K — making the Core i5-10400F the 51.7% better value option.

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Core i7-10700K
MSRP	$160-59%	$387
Performance per Dollar	81.4+70%	48.0
Release Date	2020	2020

Search Core i5-10400F on Amazon

Search Core i7-10700K on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.