PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-10400F

2020

Why buy it

✅Costs $179 less on MSRP ($160 MSRP vs $339 MSRP).
✅Delivers 30.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 81.4 vs 62.5 PassMark/$ ($160 MSRP vs $339 MSRP).
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i7-12700T.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-12700T across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (8,191 vs 21,568).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 25 MB).
❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Core i7-12700T moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Core i7-12700T

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +30.0% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+108.3% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 12 MB).
✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
✅25% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 62.5 vs 81.4 PassMark/$ ($339 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.

Core i5-10400F

2020

Core i7-12700T

2022

Why buy it

✅Costs $179 less on MSRP ($160 MSRP vs $339 MSRP).
✅Delivers 30.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 81.4 vs 62.5 PassMark/$ ($160 MSRP vs $339 MSRP).
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i7-12700T.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +30.0% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+108.3% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 12 MB).
✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
✅25% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-12700T across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (8,191 vs 21,568).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 25 MB).
❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Core i7-12700T moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 62.5 vs 81.4 PassMark/$ ($339 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-12700T better than Core i5-10400F?

Yes. Core i7-12700T is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 30.0% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data, 163.3% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, 62.7% higher PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-12700T is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 30.0% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-12700T is the better fit. You are getting 163.3% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 12 cores and 20 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 108.3% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 12 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-12700T is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i5-10400F makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Core i7-12700T is 111.9% more expensive on MSRP at $339 MSRP versus $160 MSRP, and it gives you a 30.0% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-10400F is also 30.2% better value on MSRP (81.4 vs 62.5 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper. That said, if you already own a compatible LGA1200 + DDR4 setup, Core i5-10400F can still make sense as a platform-matched option because it avoids a motherboard and RAM swap.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-12700T is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2020), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of LGA1200, 108.3% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 12 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 12 cores / 20 threads instead of 6/12. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i5-10400F Benchmark Check

Core i7-12700T Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Core i7-12700T
1080p
low	192 FPS	177 FPS
medium	152 FPS	165 FPS
high	123 FPS	136 FPS
ultra	100 FPS	116 FPS
1440p
low	153 FPS	148 FPS
medium	119 FPS	128 FPS
high	97 FPS	103 FPS
ultra	79 FPS	87 FPS
4K
low	82 FPS	84 FPS
medium	70 FPS	77 FPS
high	55 FPS	62 FPS
ultra	43 FPS	48 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Core i7-12700T

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Core i7-12700T
1080p
low	326 FPS	307 FPS
medium	318 FPS	261 FPS
high	290 FPS	220 FPS
ultra	253 FPS	200 FPS
1440p
low	326 FPS	257 FPS
medium	292 FPS	228 FPS
high	267 FPS	198 FPS
ultra	234 FPS	172 FPS
4K
low	309 FPS	157 FPS
medium	258 FPS	141 FPS
high	235 FPS	133 FPS
ultra	199 FPS	118 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Core i7-12700T

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Core i7-12700T
1080p
low	326 FPS	530 FPS
medium	326 FPS	530 FPS
high	326 FPS	530 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	461 FPS
1440p
low	326 FPS	530 FPS
medium	326 FPS	530 FPS
high	326 FPS	481 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	413 FPS
4K
low	326 FPS	496 FPS
medium	326 FPS	414 FPS
high	289 FPS	371 FPS
ultra	229 FPS	312 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Core i7-12700T

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Core i7-12700T
1080p
low	326 FPS	530 FPS
medium	326 FPS	530 FPS
high	326 FPS	530 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	530 FPS
1440p
low	326 FPS	530 FPS
medium	326 FPS	530 FPS
high	326 FPS	530 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	488 FPS
4K
low	326 FPS	515 FPS
medium	326 FPS	469 FPS
high	326 FPS	415 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	361 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Core i7-12700T

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-10400F and Core i7-12700T

Core i5-10400F

The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.

Core i7-12700T

The Core i7-12700T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Janeiro 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 12 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 1.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 21,195 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-10400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Core i7-12700T offers 12 cores / 20 threads — the Core i7-12700T has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F versus 4.7 GHz on the Core i7-12700T — a 8.9% clock advantage for the Core i7-12700T (base: 2.9 GHz vs 1.4 GHz). The Core i5-10400F uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i7-12700T uses Alder Lake-S (2022) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-10400F scores 13,029 against the Core i7-12700T's 21,195 — a 47.7% lead for the Core i7-12700T. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 8,191 vs 21,568 (89.9% advantage for the Core i7-12700T). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,454 vs 2,256, a 43.2% lead for the Core i7-12700T that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 5,783 vs 9,560 (49.2% advantage for the Core i7-12700T). L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F vs 25 MB (total) on the Core i7-12700T.

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Core i7-12700T
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	12 / 20+100%
Boost Clock	4.3 GHz	4.7 GHz+9%
Base Clock	2.9 GHz+107%	1.4 GHz
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)	25 MB (total)+108%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	1.25 MB (per core)+400%
Process	14 nm	Intel 7 nm-50%
Architecture	Comet Lake (2020−2025)	Alder Lake-S (2022)
PassMark	13,029	21,195+63%
Cinebench R23 Multi	8,191	21,568+163%
Geekbench 6 Single	1,454	2,256+55%
Geekbench 6 Multi	5,783	9,560+65%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-10400F uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-12700T uses LGA1700 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Core i5-10400F versus DDR5-4800 on the Core i7-12700T — the Core i7-12700T supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i5-10400F) vs 20 (Core i7-12700T) — the Core i7-12700T offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Core i5-10400F) and LGA1700 (Core i7-12700T).

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Core i7-12700T
Socket	LGA1200	LGA1700
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 5.0+67%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666	DDR5-4800+25%
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	128 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16	20+25%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Core i7-12700T supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. The Core i7-12700T includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 770), while the Core i5-10400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600.

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Core i7-12700T
Integrated GPU	No	Yes
IGPU Model	—	UHD Graphics 770
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	Gaming	—

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i5-10400F launched at $160 MSRP, while the Core i7-12700T debuted at $339. On MSRP ($160 vs $339), the Core i5-10400F is $179 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-10400F delivers 81.4 pts/$ vs 62.5 pts/$ for the Core i7-12700T — making the Core i5-10400F the 26.3% better value option.