
Core i5-10400F

Core i7-12700T
Core i5-10400F vs Core i7-12700T Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-10400F vs Core i7-12700T FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-10400F vs Core i7-12700T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-10400F
2020Why buy it
- β Costs $179 less on MSRP ($160 MSRP vs $339 MSRP).
- β Delivers 30.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 81.4 vs 62.5 PassMark/$ ($160 MSRP vs $339 MSRP).
- β Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i7-12700T.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-12700T across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower Cinebench R23 multi-core (8,191 vs 21,568).
- βSmaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 25 MB).
- β85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
- βOlder platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Core i7-12700T moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Core i7-12700T
2022Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +21.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β +108.3% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 12 MB).
- β Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
- β Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
- β 25% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 62.5 vs 81.4 PassMark/$ ($339 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
- βNo boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-12700T better than Core i5-10400F?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-10400F vs Core i7-12700T Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-10400F
The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020β2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.

Core i7-12700T
The Core i7-12700T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Janeiro 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 12 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 1.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 21,195 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i5-10400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Core i7-12700T offers 12 cores / 20 threads β the Core i7-12700T has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F versus 4.7 GHz on the Core i7-12700T β a 8.9% clock advantage for the Core i7-12700T (base: 2.9 GHz vs 1.4 GHz). The Core i5-10400F uses the Comet Lake (2020β2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i7-12700T uses Alder Lake-S (2022) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-10400F scores 13,029 against the Core i7-12700T's 21,195 β a 47.7% lead for the Core i7-12700T. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 8,191 vs 21,568 (89.9% advantage for the Core i7-12700T). Geekbench 6 single-core β the metric most relevant to gaming β records 1,454 vs 2,256, a 43.2% lead for the Core i7-12700T that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 5,783 vs 9,560 (49.2% advantage for the Core i7-12700T). L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F vs 25 MB (total) on the Core i7-12700T.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Core i7-12700T |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 12 / 20+100% |
| Boost Clock | 4.3 GHz | 4.7 GHz+9% |
| Base Clock | 2.9 GHz+107% | 1.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 25 MB (total)+108% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core)+20380% | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | Intel 7 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Comet Lake (2020β2025) | Alder Lake-S (2022) |
| PassMark | 13,029 | 21,195+63% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 8,191 | 21,568+163% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,454 | 2,256+55% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 5,783 | 9,560+65% |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-10400F uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-12700T uses LGA1700 (PCIe 5.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Core i5-10400F versus DDR5-4800 on the Core i7-12700T β the Core i7-12700T supports 80% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i5-10400F) vs 20 (Core i7-12700T) β the Core i7-12700T offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Core i5-10400F) and LGA1700 (Core i7-12700T).
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Core i7-12700T |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1200 | LGA1700 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 5.0+67% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | DDR5-4800+80% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 20+25% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Core i7-12700T supports AVX-512 instructions β important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. The Core i7-12700T includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 770), while the Core i5-10400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Core i7-12700T |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | β | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Gaming | β |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i5-10400F was priced at $160, while the Core i7-12700T came in at $339. On launch pricing ($160 vs $339), Core i5-10400F was $179 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-10400F delivers 81.4 pts/$ vs 62.5 pts/$ for the Core i7-12700T β making the Core i5-10400F the 26.3% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Core i7-12700T |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $160-53% | $339 |
| Performance per Dollar | 81.4+30% | 62.5 |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2022 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














