PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-10400F

2020

Why buy it

✅Costs $230 less on MSRP ($160 MSRP vs $390 MSRP).
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i7-13700E.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13700E across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (8,191 vs 24,775).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 30 MB).
❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Core i7-13700E moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-13700E can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i7-13700E

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +54.6% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+150% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 12 MB).
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
✅25% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 770, while Core i5-10400F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌
143.8% HIGHER MSRP
$390 MSRPvs$160 MSRP
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.

Core i5-10400F

2020

Core i7-13700E

2023

Why buy it

✅Costs $230 less on MSRP ($160 MSRP vs $390 MSRP).
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i7-13700E.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +54.6% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+150% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 12 MB).
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
✅25% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 770, while Core i5-10400F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13700E across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (8,191 vs 24,775).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 30 MB).
❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Core i7-13700E moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-13700E can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌
143.8% HIGHER MSRP
$390 MSRPvs$160 MSRP
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-13700E better than Core i5-10400F?

Yes. Core i7-13700E is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 54.6% average FPS lead across 3 shared CPU game tests in our data, 202.5% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, 159.6% higher PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-13700E is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 54.6% more average FPS across 3 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-13700E is the better fit. You are getting 202.5% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 16 cores and 24 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 150% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 12 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-13700E is the smarter buy today. Core i7-13700E is 143.8% more expensive on MSRP at $390 MSRP versus $160 MSRP, and it gives you a 54.6% average FPS lead across 3 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 6.5% better value on MSRP (86.7 vs 81.4 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper. That said, if you already own a compatible LGA1200 + DDR4 setup, Core i5-10400F can still make sense as a platform-matched option because it avoids a motherboard and RAM swap.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-13700E is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2020), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of LGA1200, 150% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 12 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 24 threads instead of 6/12. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i5-10400F Benchmark Check

Core i7-13700E Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Core i7-13700E
1080p
low	192 FPS	255 FPS
medium	152 FPS	239 FPS
high	123 FPS	203 FPS
ultra	100 FPS	173 FPS
1440p
low	153 FPS	219 FPS
medium	119 FPS	186 FPS
high	97 FPS	151 FPS
ultra	79 FPS	133 FPS
4K
low	82 FPS	149 FPS
medium	70 FPS	127 FPS
high	55 FPS	98 FPS
ultra	43 FPS	86 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Core i7-13700E

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Core i7-13700E
1080p
low	326 FPS	362 FPS
medium	318 FPS	310 FPS
high	290 FPS	260 FPS
ultra	253 FPS	234 FPS
1440p
low	326 FPS	315 FPS
medium	292 FPS	279 FPS
high	267 FPS	236 FPS
ultra	234 FPS	200 FPS
4K
low	309 FPS	186 FPS
medium	258 FPS	169 FPS
high	235 FPS	160 FPS
ultra	199 FPS	138 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Core i7-13700E

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Core i7-13700E
1080p
low	326 FPS	817 FPS
medium	326 FPS	655 FPS
high	326 FPS	572 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	483 FPS
1440p
low	326 FPS	719 FPS
medium	326 FPS	587 FPS
high	326 FPS	506 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	429 FPS
4K
low	326 FPS	512 FPS
medium	326 FPS	430 FPS
high	289 FPS	387 FPS
ultra	229 FPS	328 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Core i7-13700E

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Core i7-13700E
1080p
low	326 FPS	846 FPS
medium	326 FPS	846 FPS
high	326 FPS	754 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	682 FPS
1440p
low	326 FPS	810 FPS
medium	326 FPS	724 FPS
high	326 FPS	625 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	552 FPS
4K
low	326 FPS	557 FPS
medium	326 FPS	505 FPS
high	326 FPS	451 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	396 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Core i7-13700E

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-10400F and Core i7-13700E

Core i5-10400F

The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.

Core i7-13700E

The Core i7-13700E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 33,824 points. Launch price was $499.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-10400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Core i7-13700E offers 16 cores / 24 threads — the Core i7-13700E has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F versus 5.1 GHz on the Core i7-13700E — a 17% clock advantage for the Core i7-13700E (base: 2.9 GHz vs 1.9 GHz). The Core i5-10400F uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i7-13700E uses Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-10400F scores 13,029 against the Core i7-13700E's 33,824 — a 88.8% lead for the Core i7-13700E. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 8,191 vs 24,775 (100.6% advantage for the Core i7-13700E). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,454 vs 2,118, a 37.2% lead for the Core i7-13700E that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 5,783 vs 14,711 (87.1% advantage for the Core i7-13700E). L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F vs 30 MB (total) on the Core i7-13700E.

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Core i7-13700E
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	16 / 24+167%
Boost Clock	4.3 GHz	5.1 GHz+19%
Base Clock	2.9 GHz+53%	1.9 GHz
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)	30 MB (total)+150%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	2 MB (per core)+700%
Process	14 nm	10 nm-29%
Architecture	Comet Lake (2020−2025)	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
PassMark	13,029	33,824+160%
Cinebench R23 Multi	8,191	24,775+202%
Geekbench 6 Single	1,454	2,118+46%
Geekbench 6 Multi	5,783	14,711+154%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-10400F uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-13700E uses LGA1700 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Core i5-10400F versus DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200 on the Core i7-13700E — the Core i7-13700E supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i5-10400F) vs 20 (Core i7-13700E) — the Core i7-13700E offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Core i5-10400F) and H610E,Q670E,R680E,W680 (Core i7-13700E).

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Core i7-13700E
Socket	LGA1200	LGA1700
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 5.0+67%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666	DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200+25%
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	128 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16	20+25%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-13700E). The Core i7-13700E includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 770), while the Core i5-10400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming, Core i7-13700E targets Embedded Workstation. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600; Core i7-13700E rivals Ryzen 7 7700.

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Core i7-13700E
Integrated GPU	No	Yes
IGPU Model	—	UHD Graphics 770
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use	Gaming	Embedded Workstation

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i5-10400F launched at $160 MSRP, while the Core i7-13700E debuted at $390. On MSRP ($160 vs $390), the Core i5-10400F is $230 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-10400F delivers 81.4 pts/$ vs 86.7 pts/$ for the Core i7-13700E — making the Core i7-13700E the 6.3% better value option.