PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-10400F

2020

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.6% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $99 less on MSRP ($160 MSRP vs $259 MSRP).
✅Delivers 67.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 81.4 vs 48.6 PassMark/$ ($160 MSRP vs $259 MSRP).
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i7-9700E.

Trade-offs

❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-9700E can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i7-9700E

2019

Why buy it

✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Core i5-10400F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-10400F across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (6,800 vs 8,191).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 48.6 vs 81.4 PassMark/$ ($259 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.

Core i5-10400F

2020

Core i7-9700E

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.6% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $99 less on MSRP ($160 MSRP vs $259 MSRP).
✅Delivers 67.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 81.4 vs 48.6 PassMark/$ ($160 MSRP vs $259 MSRP).
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i7-9700E.

Why buy it

✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Core i5-10400F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-9700E can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-10400F across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (6,800 vs 8,191).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 48.6 vs 81.4 PassMark/$ ($259 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-10400F better than Core i7-9700E?

Yes. Core i5-10400F is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 6.6% average FPS lead across 3 shared CPU game tests in our data, 20.5% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, 3.6% higher PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-10400F is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 6.6% more average FPS across 3 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-10400F is the better fit. You are getting 20.5% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-10400F is the smarter buy today. Core i5-10400F is $99 cheaper on MSRP at $160 MSRP versus $259 MSRP, and it gives you a 6.6% average FPS lead across 3 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 67.7% better value on MSRP (81.4 vs 48.6 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-10400F is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2019) and more multi-core headroom with 6 cores / 12 threads instead of 8/8. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i5-10400F Benchmark Check

Core i7-9700E Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Core i7-9700E
1080p
low	192 FPS	171 FPS
medium	152 FPS	146 FPS
high	123 FPS	120 FPS
ultra	100 FPS	100 FPS
1440p
low	153 FPS	145 FPS
medium	119 FPS	122 FPS
high	97 FPS	100 FPS
ultra	79 FPS	83 FPS
4K
low	82 FPS	79 FPS
medium	70 FPS	72 FPS
high	55 FPS	57 FPS
ultra	43 FPS	45 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Core i7-9700E

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Core i7-9700E
1080p
low	326 FPS	309 FPS
medium	318 FPS	267 FPS
high	290 FPS	249 FPS
ultra	253 FPS	221 FPS
1440p
low	326 FPS	278 FPS
medium	292 FPS	246 FPS
high	267 FPS	230 FPS
ultra	234 FPS	201 FPS
4K
low	309 FPS	222 FPS
medium	258 FPS	200 FPS
high	235 FPS	190 FPS
ultra	199 FPS	165 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Core i7-9700E

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Core i7-9700E
1080p
low	326 FPS	314 FPS
medium	326 FPS	314 FPS
high	326 FPS	314 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	314 FPS
1440p
low	326 FPS	314 FPS
medium	326 FPS	314 FPS
high	326 FPS	314 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	314 FPS
4K
low	326 FPS	314 FPS
medium	326 FPS	314 FPS
high	289 FPS	314 FPS
ultra	229 FPS	271 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Core i7-9700E

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Core i7-9700E
1080p
low	326 FPS	314 FPS
medium	326 FPS	314 FPS
high	326 FPS	314 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	314 FPS
1440p
low	326 FPS	314 FPS
medium	326 FPS	314 FPS
high	326 FPS	314 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	314 FPS
4K
low	326 FPS	314 FPS
medium	326 FPS	314 FPS
high	326 FPS	314 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	314 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Core i7-9700E

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-10400F and Core i7-9700E

Core i5-10400F

The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.

Core i7-9700E

The Core i7-9700E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 12,575 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-10400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Core i7-9700E offers 8 cores / 8 threads — the Core i7-9700E has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F versus 4.4 GHz on the Core i7-9700E — a 2.3% clock advantage for the Core i7-9700E (base: 2.9 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Core i5-10400F uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i7-9700E uses Coffee Lake (2017−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-10400F scores 13,029 against the Core i7-9700E's 12,575 — a 3.5% lead for the Core i5-10400F. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 8,191 vs 6,800 (18.6% advantage for the Core i5-10400F). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,454 vs 1,172, a 21.5% lead for the Core i5-10400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 5,783 vs 6,802 (16.2% advantage for the Core i7-9700E). Both processors carry 12 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Core i7-9700E
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	8 / 8+33%
Boost Clock	4.3 GHz	4.4 GHz+2%
Base Clock	2.9 GHz+12%	2.6 GHz
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)	12 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	256K (per core)
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Comet Lake (2020−2025)	Coffee Lake (2017−2019)
PassMark	13,029+4%	12,575
Cinebench R23 Multi	8,191+20%	6,800
Geekbench 6 Single	1,454+24%	1,172
Geekbench 6 Multi	5,783	6,802+18%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-10400F uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-9700E uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-2666 memory speed. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Core i5-10400F) and H310,B360,H370,Q370,Z370,Z390 (Core i7-9700E).

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Core i7-9700E
Socket	LGA1200	LGA1151
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666	DDR4-2666
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	128 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F) vs Yes (Core i7-9700E). The Core i7-9700E includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Core i5-10400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600.

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Core i7-9700E
Integrated GPU	No	Yes
IGPU Model	—	UHD Graphics 630
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	Yes
Target Use	Gaming	—

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i5-10400F launched at $160 MSRP, while the Core i7-9700E debuted at $259. On MSRP ($160 vs $259), the Core i5-10400F is $99 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-10400F delivers 81.4 pts/$ vs 48.6 pts/$ for the Core i7-9700E — making the Core i5-10400F the 50.6% better value option.