PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-10400F

2020

Why buy it

✅Costs $457 less on MSRP ($160 MSRP vs $617 MSRP).
✅Delivers 85.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 81.4 vs 43.9 PassMark/$ ($160 MSRP vs $617 MSRP).
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i9-12900H.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-12900H across 7 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (8,191 vs 16,500).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 24 MB).
❌44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.
❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Core i9-12900H moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.

Core i9-12900H

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +60.8% higher average FPS across 7 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 12 MB).
✅Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
✅25% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 43.9 vs 81.4 PassMark/$ ($617 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.

Core i5-10400F

2020

Core i9-12900H

2022

Why buy it

✅Costs $457 less on MSRP ($160 MSRP vs $617 MSRP).
✅Delivers 85.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 81.4 vs 43.9 PassMark/$ ($160 MSRP vs $617 MSRP).
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i9-12900H.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +60.8% higher average FPS across 7 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 12 MB).
✅Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
✅25% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-12900H across 7 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (8,191 vs 16,500).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 24 MB).
❌44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.
❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Core i9-12900H moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 43.9 vs 81.4 PassMark/$ ($617 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i9-12900H better than Core i5-10400F?

Yes. Core i9-12900H is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 60.8% average FPS lead across 7 shared CPU game tests in our data, 101.4% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, 107.8% higher PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i9-12900H is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 60.8% more average FPS across 7 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i9-12900H is the better fit. You are getting 101.4% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 14 cores and 20 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 12 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i9-12900H is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i5-10400F makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Core i9-12900H is 285.6% more expensive on MSRP at $617 MSRP versus $160 MSRP, and it gives you a 60.8% average FPS lead across 7 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-10400F is also 85.5% better value on MSRP (81.4 vs 43.9 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i9-12900H is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2020), a healthier platform with FCBGA1744 and DDR5 instead of LGA1200, 100% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 12 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 14 cores / 20 threads instead of 6/12. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i5-10400F Benchmark Check

Core i9-12900H Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Core i9-12900H
1080p
low	192 FPS	267 FPS
medium	152 FPS	257 FPS
high	123 FPS	213 FPS
ultra	100 FPS	183 FPS
1440p
low	153 FPS	229 FPS
medium	119 FPS	197 FPS
high	97 FPS	159 FPS
ultra	79 FPS	139 FPS
4K
low	82 FPS	159 FPS
medium	70 FPS	136 FPS
high	55 FPS	106 FPS
ultra	43 FPS	93 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Core i9-12900H

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Core i9-12900H
1080p
low	326 FPS	635 FPS
medium	318 FPS	539 FPS
high	290 FPS	458 FPS
ultra	253 FPS	418 FPS
1440p
low	326 FPS	549 FPS
medium	292 FPS	486 FPS
high	267 FPS	414 FPS
ultra	234 FPS	357 FPS
4K
low	309 FPS	324 FPS
medium	258 FPS	291 FPS
high	235 FPS	277 FPS
ultra	199 FPS	243 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Core i9-12900H

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Core i9-12900H
1080p
low	326 FPS	677 FPS
medium	326 FPS	616 FPS
high	326 FPS	545 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	462 FPS
1440p
low	326 FPS	677 FPS
medium	326 FPS	554 FPS
high	326 FPS	485 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	416 FPS
4K
low	326 FPS	498 FPS
medium	326 FPS	416 FPS
high	289 FPS	373 FPS
ultra	229 FPS	314 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Core i9-12900H

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Core i9-12900H
1080p
low	326 FPS	677 FPS
medium	326 FPS	677 FPS
high	326 FPS	677 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	604 FPS
1440p
low	326 FPS	677 FPS
medium	326 FPS	663 FPS
high	326 FPS	572 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	498 FPS
4K
low	326 FPS	525 FPS
medium	326 FPS	476 FPS
high	326 FPS	423 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	368 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Core i9-12900H

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-10400F and Core i9-12900H

Core i5-10400F

The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.

Core i9-12900H

The Core i9-12900H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-H (2022) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 27,079 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-10400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Core i9-12900H offers 14 cores / 20 threads — the Core i9-12900H has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F versus 5 GHz on the Core i9-12900H — a 15.1% clock advantage for the Core i9-12900H (base: 2.9 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core i5-10400F uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i9-12900H uses Alder Lake-H (2022) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-10400F scores 13,029 against the Core i9-12900H's 27,079 — a 70.1% lead for the Core i9-12900H. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 8,191 vs 16,500 (67.3% advantage for the Core i9-12900H). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,454 vs 2,400, a 49.1% lead for the Core i9-12900H that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 5,783 vs 12,900 (76.2% advantage for the Core i9-12900H). L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F vs 24 MB (total) on the Core i9-12900H.

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Core i9-12900H
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	14 / 20+133%
Boost Clock	4.3 GHz	5 GHz+16%
Base Clock	2.9 GHz+16%	2.5 GHz
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)	24 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	1.25 MB (per core)+400%
Process	14 nm	Intel 7 nm-50%
Architecture	Comet Lake (2020−2025)	Alder Lake-H (2022)
PassMark	13,029	27,079+108%
Cinebench R23 Multi	8,191	16,500+101%
Geekbench 6 Single	1,454	2,400+65%
Geekbench 6 Multi	5,783	12,900+123%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-10400F uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i9-12900H uses FCBGA1744 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Core i5-10400F versus DDR5-4800 on the Core i9-12900H — the Core i9-12900H supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-10400F supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i5-10400F) vs 20 (Core i9-12900H) — the Core i9-12900H offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Core i5-10400F) and Intel 600 Series (Mobile) (Core i9-12900H).

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Core i9-12900H
Socket	LGA1200	FCBGA1744
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 5.0+67%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666	DDR5-4800+25%
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB+100%	64 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	20+25%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Core i9-12900H has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F) vs Yes (Core i9-12900H). The Core i9-12900H includes integrated graphics (Iris Xe Graphics 96EU), while the Core i5-10400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming, Core i9-12900H targets Mobile. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600.

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Core i9-12900H
Integrated GPU	No	Yes
IGPU Model	—	Iris Xe Graphics 96EU
Unlocked	No	Yes
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	Yes
Target Use	Gaming	Mobile

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i5-10400F launched at $160 MSRP, while the Core i9-12900H debuted at $617. On MSRP ($160 vs $617), the Core i5-10400F is $457 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-10400F delivers 81.4 pts/$ vs 43.9 pts/$ for the Core i9-12900H — making the Core i5-10400F the 59.9% better value option.