Core i5-10400F vs Ryzen 3 8300G

Intel

Core i5-10400F

6 Cores12 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.3 GHz2020

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Ryzen 3 8300G

4 Cores8 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.9 GHz2024

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-10400F

2020

Why buy it

  • +50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
  • Costs $16 less on MSRP ($160 MSRP vs $176 MSRP).
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 3 8300G.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (13,029 vs 14,113).
  • Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Ryzen 3 8300G moves to AM5 and DDR5.

Ryzen 3 8300G

2024

Why buy it

  • Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

  • Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).
  • 10% HIGHER MSRP
    $176 MSRPvs$160 MSRP
  • No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 3 8300G better than Core i5-10400F?
Yes. Ryzen 3 8300G is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 0.8% average FPS lead across 3 shared CPU game tests in our data, 8.3% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 3 8300G is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 0.8% more average FPS across 3 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 3 8300G is the better fit. You are getting 8.3% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Ryzen 3 8300G is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i5-10400F makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Ryzen 3 8300G is 10.0% more expensive on MSRP at $176 MSRP versus $160 MSRP, and it gives you a 0.8% average FPS lead across 3 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-10400F is also 1.6% better value on MSRP (81.4 vs 80.2 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper. That said, if you already own a compatible LGA1200 + DDR4 setup, Core i5-10400F can still make sense as a platform-matched option because it avoids a motherboard and RAM swap.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 3 8300G is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2020), a healthier platform with AM5 and DDR5 instead of LGA1200, and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 6/12. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetCore i5-10400FRyzen 3 8300G
1080p
low192 FPS262 FPS
medium152 FPS232 FPS
high123 FPS199 FPS
ultra100 FPS168 FPS
1440p
low153 FPS229 FPS
medium119 FPS184 FPS
high97 FPS152 FPS
ultra79 FPS132 FPS
4K
low82 FPS159 FPS
medium70 FPS129 FPS
high55 FPS99 FPS
ultra43 FPS86 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetCore i5-10400FRyzen 3 8300G
1080p
low326 FPS347 FPS
medium318 FPS280 FPS
high290 FPS245 FPS
ultra253 FPS206 FPS
1440p
low326 FPS286 FPS
medium292 FPS238 FPS
high267 FPS214 FPS
ultra234 FPS176 FPS
4K
low309 FPS212 FPS
medium258 FPS183 FPS
high235 FPS153 FPS
ultra199 FPS124 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetCore i5-10400FRyzen 3 8300G
1080p
low326 FPS353 FPS
medium326 FPS353 FPS
high326 FPS353 FPS
ultra326 FPS353 FPS
1440p
low326 FPS353 FPS
medium326 FPS353 FPS
high326 FPS353 FPS
ultra326 FPS353 FPS
4K
low326 FPS353 FPS
medium326 FPS353 FPS
high289 FPS352 FPS
ultra229 FPS292 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetCore i5-10400FRyzen 3 8300G
1080p
low326 FPS353 FPS
medium326 FPS353 FPS
high326 FPS353 FPS
ultra326 FPS353 FPS
1440p
low326 FPS353 FPS
medium326 FPS353 FPS
high326 FPS353 FPS
ultra326 FPS353 FPS
4K
low326 FPS353 FPS
medium326 FPS353 FPS
high326 FPS353 FPS
ultra326 FPS353 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-10400F and Ryzen 3 8300G

Intel

Core i5-10400F

The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.

AMD

Ryzen 3 8300G

The Ryzen 3 8300G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 8 January 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Phoenix2 (2024) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 14,113 points. Launch price was $176.

Processing Power

The Core i5-10400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 3 8300G offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Core i5-10400F has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F versus 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 3 8300G — a 13% clock advantage for the Ryzen 3 8300G (base: 2.9 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Core i5-10400F uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 3 8300G uses Phoenix2 (2024) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-10400F scores 13,029 against the Ryzen 3 8300G's 14,113 — a 8% lead for the Ryzen 3 8300G. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F vs 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 8300G.

FeatureCore i5-10400FRyzen 3 8300G
Cores / Threads
6 / 12+50%
4 / 8
Boost Clock
4.3 GHz
4.9 GHz+14%
Base Clock
2.9 GHz
3.4 GHz+17%
L3 Cache
12 MB (total)+50%
8 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
1 MB (per core)+300%
Process
14 nm
4 nm-71%
Architecture
Comet Lake (2020−2025)
Phoenix2 (2024)
PassMark
13,029
14,113+8%
Cinebench R23 Multi
8,191
Geekbench 6 Single
1,454
Geekbench 6 Multi
5,783
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-10400F uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 3 8300G uses AM5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i5-10400FRyzen 3 8300G
Socket
LGA1200
AM5
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2666
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F) / not specified (Ryzen 3 8300G). Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600.

FeatureCore i5-10400FRyzen 3 8300G
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Gaming
💰

Value Analysis

The Core i5-10400F launched at $160 MSRP, while the Ryzen 3 8300G debuted at $176. On MSRP ($160 vs $176), the Core i5-10400F is $16 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-10400F delivers 81.4 pts/$ vs 80.2 pts/$ for the Ryzen 3 8300G — making the Core i5-10400F the 1.5% better value option.

FeatureCore i5-10400FRyzen 3 8300G
MSRP
$160-9%
$176
Performance per Dollar
81.4+1%
80.2
Release Date
2020
2024