
Core i5-10400F
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 4600H
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-10400F
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.4% higher average FPS across 24 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 5 4600H.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (13,029 vs 14,173).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $160 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 4600H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.
Ryzen 5 4600H
2020Why buy it
- ✅+8.8% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-10400F across 24 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.
Core i5-10400F
2020Ryzen 5 4600H
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.4% higher average FPS across 24 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 5 4600H.
Why buy it
- ✅+8.8% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (13,029 vs 14,173).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $160 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 4600H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-10400F across 24 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 4600H better than Core i5-10400F?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-10400F | Ryzen 5 4600H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 192 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 152 FPS | 141 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 89 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 148 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 119 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 93 FPS |
| ultra | 79 FPS | 73 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 82 FPS | 69 FPS |
| medium | 70 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 37 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-10400F | Ryzen 5 4600H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 267 FPS |
| medium | 318 FPS | 224 FPS |
| high | 290 FPS | 196 FPS |
| ultra | 253 FPS | 153 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 225 FPS |
| medium | 292 FPS | 193 FPS |
| high | 267 FPS | 173 FPS |
| ultra | 234 FPS | 139 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 309 FPS | 192 FPS |
| medium | 258 FPS | 171 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 149 FPS |
| ultra | 199 FPS | 114 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-10400F | Ryzen 5 4600H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 354 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 354 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 354 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 354 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 354 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 354 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 354 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 354 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 354 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 353 FPS |
| high | 289 FPS | 301 FPS |
| ultra | 229 FPS | 242 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-10400F | Ryzen 5 4600H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 354 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 354 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 354 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 354 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 354 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 354 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 354 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 354 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 354 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 354 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 342 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 287 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-10400F and Ryzen 5 4600H

Core i5-10400F
Core i5-10400F
The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.


Ryzen 5 4600H
Ryzen 5 4600H
The Ryzen 5 4600H is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Renoir-H (Zen 2) (2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,173 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
Both the Core i5-10400F and Ryzen 5 4600H share an identical 6-core/12-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F versus 4 GHz on the Ryzen 5 4600H — a 7.2% clock advantage for the Core i5-10400F (base: 2.9 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Core i5-10400F uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 5 4600H uses Renoir-H (Zen 2) (2020) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-10400F scores 13,029 against the Ryzen 5 4600H's 14,173 — a 8.4% lead for the Ryzen 5 4600H. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F vs 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 4600H.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Ryzen 5 4600H |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.3 GHz+7% | 4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.9 GHz | 3 GHz+3% |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total)+50% | 8 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 512 kB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 14 nm | 7 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Comet Lake (2020−2025) | Renoir-H (Zen 2) (2020) |
| PassMark | 13,029 | 14,173+9% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 8,191 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,454 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 5,783 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-10400F uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 5 4600H uses FP6 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Ryzen 5 4600H |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1200 | FP6 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F) / not specified (Ryzen 5 4600H). Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Ryzen 5 4600H |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Gaming | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











