
Core i5-10400F
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-10400F
2020Why buy it
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (13,029 vs 14,249).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $160 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.
Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.6% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.
Core i5-10400F
2020Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U
2021Why buy it
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.6% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (13,029 vs 14,249).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $160 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.
Trade-offs
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U better than Core i5-10400F?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-10400F | Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 192 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 152 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 119 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 98 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 146 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 123 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 79 FPS | 79 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 82 FPS | 69 FPS |
| medium | 70 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 39 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-10400F | Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 338 FPS |
| medium | 318 FPS | 289 FPS |
| high | 290 FPS | 261 FPS |
| ultra | 253 FPS | 226 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 299 FPS |
| medium | 292 FPS | 262 FPS |
| high | 267 FPS | 240 FPS |
| ultra | 234 FPS | 206 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 309 FPS | 235 FPS |
| medium | 258 FPS | 208 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 194 FPS |
| ultra | 199 FPS | 165 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-10400F | Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 356 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 356 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 356 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 356 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 356 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 356 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 356 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 312 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 350 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 300 FPS |
| high | 289 FPS | 258 FPS |
| ultra | 229 FPS | 203 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-10400F | Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 356 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 356 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 356 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 356 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 356 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 356 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 356 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 356 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 356 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 356 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 333 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 285 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-10400F and Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U

Core i5-10400F
Core i5-10400F
The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.


Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U
Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U
The Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 16 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Cezanne-U PRO (Zen 3) (2021) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,249 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
Both the Core i5-10400F and Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U share an identical 6-core/12-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F versus 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U — a 2.4% clock advantage for the Core i5-10400F (base: 2.9 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Core i5-10400F uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U uses Cezanne-U PRO (Zen 3) (2021) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-10400F scores 13,029 against the Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U's 14,249 — a 8.9% lead for the Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.3 GHz+2% | 4.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.9 GHz+26% | 2.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 16 MB (total)+33% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 512K (per core)+100% |
| Process | 14 nm | 7 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Comet Lake (2020−2025) | Cezanne-U PRO (Zen 3) (2021) |
| PassMark | 13,029 | 14,249+9% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 8,191 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,454 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 5,783 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-10400F uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U uses FP6 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1200 | FP6 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F) / not specified (Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U). Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Gaming | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











