Core i5-10400F vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U

Intel

Core i5-10400F

6 Cores12 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.3 GHz2020
Core family
·······
VS
AMD

Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U

6 Cores12 Thrd15 WWMax: 4.3 GHz2022
Similar parts
·······

Core i5-10400F vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-10400F vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-10400F vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-10400F

2020

Why buy it

  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (13,029 vs 14,213).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
  • Launch MSRP is still $160 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • 333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.

Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U

2022

Why buy it

  • +9.1% higher PassMark.
  • +33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
  • Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U better than Core i5-10400F?
Yes. Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 9.1% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
For gaming, this matchup is basically a tie in the data we have.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U is the stronger fit. You are getting 9.1% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i5-10400F is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $160 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-10400F is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (81.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2020), 33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 6 cores / 12 threads instead of 6/12. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i5-10400F vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core i5-10400F

The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.

AMD

Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U

The Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Barcelo-U PRO (Zen 3) (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,213 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

Both the Core i5-10400F and Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U share an identical 6-core/12-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F versus 4.3 GHz on the Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U — identical boost frequencies (base: 2.9 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Core i5-10400F uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U uses Barcelo-U PRO (Zen 3) (2022) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-10400F scores 13,029 against the Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U's 14,213 — a 8.7% lead for the Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U.

FeatureCore i5-10400FRyzen 5 PRO 5675U
Cores / Threads
6 / 12
6 / 12
Boost Clock
4.3 GHz
4.3 GHz
Base Clock
2.9 GHz+26%
2.3 GHz
L3 Cache
12 MB (total)
16 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
512K (per core)+100%
Process
14 nm
7 nm-50%
Architecture
Comet Lake (2020−2025)
Barcelo-U PRO (Zen 3) (2022)
PassMark
13,029
14,213+9%
Cinebench R23 Multi
8,191
Geekbench 6 Single
1,454
Geekbench 6 Multi
5,783
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-10400F uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U uses FP6 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i5-10400FRyzen 5 PRO 5675U
Socket
LGA1200
FP6
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2666
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F) / not specified (Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U). Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600.

FeatureCore i5-10400FRyzen 5 PRO 5675U
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Gaming