PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-10400F

2020

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS across 24 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (13,029 vs 22,132).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $160 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌983.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 6W.

Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +35.5% higher average FPS across 24 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
✅Draws 6W instead of 65W, a 59W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP7/FP8 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.

Core i5-10400F

2020

Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS

2023

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +35.5% higher average FPS across 24 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
✅Draws 6W instead of 65W, a 59W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP7/FP8 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS across 24 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (13,029 vs 22,132).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $160 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌983.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 6W.

Trade-offs

❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS better than Core i5-10400F?

Yes. Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 35.5% average FPS lead across 24 shared CPU game tests in our data, 69.9% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 35.5% more average FPS across 24 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS is the better fit. You are getting 69.9% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i5-10400F makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $160 MSRP, and it gives you a 35.5% average FPS lead across 24 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-10400F is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (81.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2020), a healthier platform with FP7/FP8 and DDR5 instead of LGA1200, 33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 6 cores / 12 threads instead of 6/12. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i5-10400F Benchmark Check

Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS
1080p
low	192 FPS	269 FPS
medium	152 FPS	242 FPS
high	123 FPS	203 FPS
ultra	100 FPS	175 FPS
1440p
low	153 FPS	236 FPS
medium	119 FPS	193 FPS
high	97 FPS	157 FPS
ultra	79 FPS	138 FPS
4K
low	82 FPS	164 FPS
medium	70 FPS	136 FPS
high	55 FPS	105 FPS
ultra	43 FPS	92 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS
1080p
low	326 FPS	447 FPS
medium	318 FPS	371 FPS
high	290 FPS	326 FPS
ultra	253 FPS	287 FPS
1440p
low	326 FPS	388 FPS
medium	292 FPS	336 FPS
high	267 FPS	297 FPS
ultra	234 FPS	254 FPS
4K
low	309 FPS	279 FPS
medium	258 FPS	247 FPS
high	235 FPS	231 FPS
ultra	199 FPS	194 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS
1080p
low	326 FPS	553 FPS
medium	326 FPS	553 FPS
high	326 FPS	553 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	537 FPS
1440p
low	326 FPS	553 FPS
medium	326 FPS	553 FPS
high	326 FPS	517 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	445 FPS
4K
low	326 FPS	502 FPS
medium	326 FPS	444 FPS
high	289 FPS	378 FPS
ultra	229 FPS	312 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS
1080p
low	326 FPS	553 FPS
medium	326 FPS	553 FPS
high	326 FPS	553 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	553 FPS
1440p
low	326 FPS	553 FPS
medium	326 FPS	553 FPS
high	326 FPS	553 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	547 FPS
4K
low	326 FPS	553 FPS
medium	326 FPS	507 FPS
high	326 FPS	452 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	387 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-10400F and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS

Core i5-10400F

The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.

Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS

The Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix (Zen4) (2023) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 4.3 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7/FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 MB + 16 MB. Memory support: LPDDR5x, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 22,132 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i5-10400F and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS share an identical 6-core/12-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F versus 5 GHz on the Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS — a 15.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS (base: 2.9 GHz vs 4.3 GHz). The Core i5-10400F uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS uses Phoenix (Zen4) (2023) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-10400F scores 13,029 against the Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS's 22,132 — a 51.8% lead for the Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F vs 16 MB on the Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS.

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	6 / 12
Boost Clock	4.3 GHz	5 GHz+16%
Base Clock	2.9 GHz	4.3 GHz+48%
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)	16 MB+33%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	6 MB+2300%
Process	14 nm	4 nm-71%
Architecture	Comet Lake (2020−2025)	Phoenix (Zen4) (2023)
PassMark	13,029	22,132+70%
Cinebench R23 Multi	8,191	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,454	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	5,783	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-10400F uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS uses FP7/FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS
Socket	LGA1200	FP7/FP8
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666	—
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F) / not specified (Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS). Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600.