
Core i5-10400F
Popular choices:

Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-10400F
2020Why buy it
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 9 7945HX3D.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 7945HX3D across 6 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (13,029 vs 57,803).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $160 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 7945HX3D mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌18.2% higher power demand at 65W vs 55W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Ryzen 9 7945HX3D moves to FL1 and DDR5.
Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +105.6% higher average FPS across 6 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 65W, a 10W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FL1 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
- ✅75% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon 610M, while Core i5-10400F needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.
Core i5-10400F
2020Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
2023Why buy it
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 9 7945HX3D.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +105.6% higher average FPS across 6 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 65W, a 10W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FL1 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
- ✅75% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon 610M, while Core i5-10400F needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 7945HX3D across 6 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (13,029 vs 57,803).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $160 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 7945HX3D mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌18.2% higher power demand at 65W vs 55W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Ryzen 9 7945HX3D moves to FL1 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 7945HX3D better than Core i5-10400F?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-10400F | Ryzen 9 7945HX3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 192 FPS | 279 FPS |
| medium | 152 FPS | 257 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 210 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 178 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 263 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 220 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 169 FPS |
| ultra | 79 FPS | 149 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 82 FPS | 183 FPS |
| medium | 70 FPS | 152 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 116 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 103 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-10400F | Ryzen 9 7945HX3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 673 FPS |
| medium | 318 FPS | 580 FPS |
| high | 290 FPS | 432 FPS |
| ultra | 253 FPS | 363 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 559 FPS |
| medium | 292 FPS | 499 FPS |
| high | 267 FPS | 385 FPS |
| ultra | 234 FPS | 301 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 309 FPS | 314 FPS |
| medium | 258 FPS | 284 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 250 FPS |
| ultra | 199 FPS | 211 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-10400F | Ryzen 9 7945HX3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 1025 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 1077 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 1022 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 875 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 884 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 805 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 740 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 647 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 539 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 464 FPS |
| high | 289 FPS | 418 FPS |
| ultra | 229 FPS | 355 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-10400F | Ryzen 9 7945HX3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 1051 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 951 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 833 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 745 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 831 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 736 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 645 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 555 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 607 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 544 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 482 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 416 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-10400F and Ryzen 9 7945HX3D

Core i5-10400F
Core i5-10400F
The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.


Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
The Ryzen 9 7945HX3D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2023-07-27. It is based on the Dragon Range-HX (Zen 4) (2023−2024) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: FL1. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 57,803 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Core i5-10400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 9 7945HX3D offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Ryzen 9 7945HX3D has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F versus 5.4 GHz on the Ryzen 9 7945HX3D — a 22.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 7945HX3D (base: 2.9 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Core i5-10400F uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 9 7945HX3D uses Dragon Range-HX (Zen 4) (2023−2024) (5 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-10400F scores 13,029 against the Ryzen 9 7945HX3D's 57,803 — a 126.4% lead for the Ryzen 9 7945HX3D. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F vs 128 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 7945HX3D.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Ryzen 9 7945HX3D |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 16 / 32+167% |
| Boost Clock | 4.3 GHz | 5.4 GHz+26% |
| Base Clock | 2.9 GHz+26% | 2.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 128 MB (total)+967% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 1 MB (per core)+300% |
| Process | 14 nm | 5 nm-64% |
| Architecture | Comet Lake (2020−2025) | Dragon Range-HX (Zen 4) (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 13,029 | 57,803+344% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 8,191 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,454 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 5,783 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-10400F uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 9 7945HX3D uses FL1 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Core i5-10400F versus 5200 on the Ryzen 9 7945HX3D — the Ryzen 9 7945HX3D supports 199.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i5-10400F) vs 28 (Ryzen 9 7945HX3D) — the Ryzen 9 7945HX3D offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Core i5-10400F) and FL1 (Ryzen 9 7945HX3D).
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Ryzen 9 7945HX3D |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1200 | FL1 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 5.0+67% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | 5200+129900% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB+104857500% | 128 |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 28+75% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 9 7945HX3D has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Ryzen 9 7945HX3D supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F) vs VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (Ryzen 9 7945HX3D). The Ryzen 9 7945HX3D includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon 610M), while the Core i5-10400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600; Ryzen 9 7945HX3D rivals Core Ultra 9 285HX.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Ryzen 9 7945HX3D |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | AMD Radeon 610M |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V |
| Target Use | Gaming | — |
Value Analysis
The Core i5-10400F launched at $160 MSRP, while the Ryzen 9 7945HX3D debuted at $0. On MSRP ($160 vs $0), the Ryzen 9 7945HX3D is $160 cheaper.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Ryzen 9 7945HX3D |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $160 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 81.4 | — |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











