PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-10400F

2020

Why buy it

✅+50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 across 42 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (13,029 vs 22,051).
❌Launch MSRP is still $160 MSRP, while Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌132.1% higher power demand at 65W vs 28W.
❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 moves to FP8 and DDR5.

Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360

2025

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +19.9% higher average FPS across 42 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 28W instead of 65W, a 37W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.

Core i5-10400F

2020

Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360

2025

Why buy it

✅+50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +19.9% higher average FPS across 42 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 28W instead of 65W, a 37W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 across 42 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (13,029 vs 22,051).
❌Launch MSRP is still $160 MSRP, while Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌132.1% higher power demand at 65W vs 28W.
❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 moves to FP8 and DDR5.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 better than Core i5-10400F?

Yes. Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 19.9% average FPS lead across 42 shared CPU game tests in our data, 69.2% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 19.9% more average FPS across 42 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 is the better fit. You are getting 69.2% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 1655 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i5-10400F makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $160 MSRP, and it gives you a 19.9% average FPS lead across 42 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-10400F is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (81.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2020), a healthier platform with FP8 and DDR5 instead of LGA1200, and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 1655 threads instead of 6/12. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i5-10400F Benchmark Check

Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360
1080p
low	192 FPS	244 FPS
medium	152 FPS	228 FPS
high	123 FPS	194 FPS
ultra	100 FPS	167 FPS
1440p
low	153 FPS	212 FPS
medium	119 FPS	180 FPS
high	97 FPS	147 FPS
ultra	79 FPS	130 FPS
4K
low	82 FPS	146 FPS
medium	70 FPS	124 FPS
high	55 FPS	95 FPS
ultra	43 FPS	84 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360
1080p
low	326 FPS	241 FPS
medium	318 FPS	206 FPS
high	290 FPS	187 FPS
ultra	253 FPS	165 FPS
1440p
low	326 FPS	216 FPS
medium	292 FPS	190 FPS
high	267 FPS	173 FPS
ultra	234 FPS	147 FPS
4K
low	309 FPS	162 FPS
medium	258 FPS	148 FPS
high	235 FPS	141 FPS
ultra	199 FPS	119 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360
1080p
low	326 FPS	551 FPS
medium	326 FPS	551 FPS
high	326 FPS	551 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	461 FPS
1440p
low	326 FPS	551 FPS
medium	326 FPS	551 FPS
high	326 FPS	488 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	410 FPS
4K
low	326 FPS	493 FPS
medium	326 FPS	408 FPS
high	289 FPS	361 FPS
ultra	229 FPS	303 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360
1080p
low	326 FPS	551 FPS
medium	326 FPS	551 FPS
high	326 FPS	551 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	551 FPS
1440p
low	326 FPS	551 FPS
medium	326 FPS	551 FPS
high	326 FPS	551 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	526 FPS
4K
low	326 FPS	543 FPS
medium	326 FPS	496 FPS
high	326 FPS	441 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	388 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-10400F and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360

Core i5-10400F

The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.

Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360

The Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Strix Point (Zen 5) (2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 AMD Zen 5 AMD Zen 5c threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 22,051 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-10400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F versus 5 GHz on the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 — a 15.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 (base: 2.9 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core i5-10400F uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 uses Strix Point (Zen 5) (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-10400F scores 13,029 against the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360's 22,051 — a 51.4% lead for the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F vs 8 MB on the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360.

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	8 / 16 AMD Zen 5 AMD Zen 5c+33%
Boost Clock	4.3 GHz	5 GHz+16%
Base Clock	2.9 GHz+45%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)+50%	8 MB
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	1 MB (per core)+300%
Process	14 nm	4 nm-71%
Architecture	Comet Lake (2020−2025)	Strix Point (Zen 5) (2025)
PassMark	13,029	22,051+69%
Cinebench R23 Multi	8,191	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,454	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	5,783	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-10400F uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360
Socket	LGA1200	FP8
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666	—
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F) / not specified (Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360). Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600.

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360
Integrated GPU	No	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	—
Target Use	Gaming	—

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i5-10400F launched at $160 MSRP, while the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 debuted at $0. On MSRP ($160 vs $0), the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 is $160 cheaper.