Core i5-10400F vs Xeon D-1823NT

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-10400F vs Xeon D-1823NT FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-10400F vs Xeon D-1823NT: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-10400F

2020

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +17.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+20% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 10 MB).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon D-1823NT.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (13,029 vs 13,673).
❌Launch MSRP is still $160 MSRP, while Xeon D-1823NT mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌18.2% higher power demand at 65W vs 55W.

Xeon D-1823NT

2023

Why buy it

✅+4.9% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 55W instead of 65W, a 10W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-10400F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (10 MB vs 12 MB).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon D-1823NT better than Core i5-10400F?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon D-1823NT makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-10400F is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon D-1823NT is the stronger fit. You are getting 4.9% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon D-1823NT is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i5-10400F is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Xeon D-1823NT comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $160 MSRP, and it still gives you 4.9% better PassMark. The compromise is that Core i5-10400F is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 17.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-10400F is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (81.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon D-1823NT makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2020) and more multi-core headroom with 6 cores / 12 threads instead of 6/12. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i5-10400F vs Xeon D-1823NT Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-10400F

The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.

Xeon D-1823NT

The Xeon D-1823NT is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 10240 kB. Socket: FCBGA2227. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,673 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i5-10400F and Xeon D-1823NT share an identical 6-core/12-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F versus 3.5 GHz on the Xeon D-1823NT — a 20.5% clock advantage for the Core i5-10400F (base: 2.9 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Core i5-10400F is built on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i5-10400F scores 13,029 against the Xeon D-1823NT's 13,673 — a 4.8% lead for the Xeon D-1823NT. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F vs 10240 kB on the Xeon D-1823NT.

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Xeon D-1823NT
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	6 / 12
Boost Clock	4.3 GHz+23%	3.5 GHz
Base Clock	2.9 GHz+4%	2.8 GHz
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)+20%	10240 kB
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	—
Process	14 nm	—
Architecture	Comet Lake (2020−2025)	—
PassMark	13,029	13,673+5%
Cinebench R23 Multi	8,191	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,454	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	5,783	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-10400F uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon D-1823NT uses FCBGA2227 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Xeon D-1823NT
Socket	LGA1200	FCBGA2227
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666	—
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F) / not specified (Xeon D-1823NT). Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600.