
Core i5-10600
Popular choices:

Ryzen 3 3300X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-10600
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.5% higher average FPS across 47 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 55.6 vs 111.9 PassMark/$ ($244 MSRP vs $120 MSRP).
Ryzen 3 3300X
2020Why buy it
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Costs $124 less on MSRP ($120 MSRP vs $244 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 101.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 111.9 vs 55.6 PassMark/$ ($120 MSRP vs $244 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-10600 across 47 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (13,425 vs 13,573).
Core i5-10600
2020Ryzen 3 3300X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.5% higher average FPS across 47 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Why buy it
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Costs $124 less on MSRP ($120 MSRP vs $244 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 101.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 111.9 vs 55.6 PassMark/$ ($120 MSRP vs $244 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 55.6 vs 111.9 PassMark/$ ($244 MSRP vs $120 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-10600 across 47 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (13,425 vs 13,573).
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-10600 better than Ryzen 3 3300X?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-10600 | Ryzen 3 3300X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 292 FPS | 166 FPS |
| medium | 258 FPS | 137 FPS |
| high | 217 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 186 FPS | 96 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 240 FPS | 145 FPS |
| medium | 191 FPS | 116 FPS |
| high | 156 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 138 FPS | 77 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 166 FPS | 79 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 68 FPS |
| high | 104 FPS | 54 FPS |
| ultra | 91 FPS | 42 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-10600 | Ryzen 3 3300X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 339 FPS | 316 FPS |
| medium | 339 FPS | 264 FPS |
| high | 334 FPS | 221 FPS |
| ultra | 292 FPS | 185 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 339 FPS | 276 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 237 FPS |
| high | 298 FPS | 202 FPS |
| ultra | 259 FPS | 166 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 337 FPS | 197 FPS |
| medium | 276 FPS | 174 FPS |
| high | 253 FPS | 142 FPS |
| ultra | 212 FPS | 116 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-10600 | Ryzen 3 3300X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 339 FPS | 336 FPS |
| medium | 339 FPS | 336 FPS |
| high | 339 FPS | 336 FPS |
| ultra | 339 FPS | 336 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 339 FPS | 336 FPS |
| medium | 339 FPS | 336 FPS |
| high | 339 FPS | 336 FPS |
| ultra | 339 FPS | 332 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 339 FPS | 336 FPS |
| medium | 339 FPS | 309 FPS |
| high | 339 FPS | 258 FPS |
| ultra | 295 FPS | 203 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-10600 | Ryzen 3 3300X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 339 FPS | 336 FPS |
| medium | 339 FPS | 336 FPS |
| high | 339 FPS | 336 FPS |
| ultra | 339 FPS | 336 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 339 FPS | 336 FPS |
| medium | 339 FPS | 336 FPS |
| high | 339 FPS | 336 FPS |
| ultra | 339 FPS | 336 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 339 FPS | 336 FPS |
| medium | 339 FPS | 336 FPS |
| high | 339 FPS | 336 FPS |
| ultra | 339 FPS | 331 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-10600 and Ryzen 3 3300X

Core i5-10600
Core i5-10600
The Core i5-10600 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 13,573 points. Launch price was $149.


Ryzen 3 3300X
Ryzen 3 3300X
The Ryzen 3 3300X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 24 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 13,425 points. Launch price was $120.
Processing Power
The Core i5-10600 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 3 3300X offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Core i5-10600 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Core i5-10600 versus 4.3 GHz on the Ryzen 3 3300X — a 11% clock advantage for the Core i5-10600 (base: 3.3 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Core i5-10600 uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 3 3300X uses Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-10600 scores 13,573 against the Ryzen 3 3300X's 13,425 — a 1.1% lead for the Core i5-10600. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10600 vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 3300X.
| Feature | Core i5-10600 | Ryzen 3 3300X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12+50% | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz+12% | 4.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.3 GHz | 3.8 GHz+15% |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 16 MB (total)+33% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 512K (per core)+100% |
| Process | 14 nm | 7 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Comet Lake (2020−2025) | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 13,573+1% | 13,425 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-10600 uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 3 3300X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-10600 | Ryzen 3 3300X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1200 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | No |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 24 |
Value Analysis
The Core i5-10600 launched at $244 MSRP, while the Ryzen 3 3300X debuted at $120. On MSRP ($244 vs $120), the Ryzen 3 3300X is $124 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-10600 delivers 55.6 pts/$ vs 111.9 pts/$ for the Ryzen 3 3300X — making the Ryzen 3 3300X the 67.2% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-10600 | Ryzen 3 3300X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $244 | $120-51% |
| Performance per Dollar | 55.6 | 111.9+101% |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2020 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












