Core i5-10600 vs Ryzen 3 3300X

Intel

Core i5-10600

6 Cores12 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.8 GHz2020

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Ryzen 3 3300X

4 Cores8 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.3 GHz2020

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-10600

2020

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +6.5% higher average FPS across 47 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

  • Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 55.6 vs 111.9 PassMark/$ ($244 MSRP vs $120 MSRP).

Ryzen 3 3300X

2020

Why buy it

  • +33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
  • Costs $124 less on MSRP ($120 MSRP vs $244 MSRP).
  • Delivers 101.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 111.9 vs 55.6 PassMark/$ ($120 MSRP vs $244 MSRP).
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-10600 across 47 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (13,425 vs 13,573).

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-10600 better than Ryzen 3 3300X?
Yes. Core i5-10600 is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 6.5% average FPS lead across 47 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1.1% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Core i5-10600 is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 6.5% more average FPS across 47 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-10600 is the better fit. You are getting 1.1% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i5-10600 is still the faster CPU overall, but Ryzen 3 3300X makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Core i5-10600 is 103.3% more expensive on MSRP at $244 MSRP versus $120 MSRP, and it gives you a 6.5% average FPS lead across 47 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen 3 3300X is also 101.1% better value on MSRP (111.9 vs 55.6 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper. That said, if you already own a compatible AM4 + DDR4 setup, Ryzen 3 3300X can still make sense as a platform-matched option because it avoids a motherboard and RAM swap.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-10600 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 6 cores / 12 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetCore i5-10600Ryzen 3 3300X
1080p
low292 FPS166 FPS
medium258 FPS137 FPS
high217 FPS118 FPS
ultra186 FPS96 FPS
1440p
low240 FPS145 FPS
medium191 FPS116 FPS
high156 FPS96 FPS
ultra138 FPS77 FPS
4K
low166 FPS79 FPS
medium135 FPS68 FPS
high104 FPS54 FPS
ultra91 FPS42 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetCore i5-10600Ryzen 3 3300X
1080p
low339 FPS316 FPS
medium339 FPS264 FPS
high334 FPS221 FPS
ultra292 FPS185 FPS
1440p
low339 FPS276 FPS
medium326 FPS237 FPS
high298 FPS202 FPS
ultra259 FPS166 FPS
4K
low337 FPS197 FPS
medium276 FPS174 FPS
high253 FPS142 FPS
ultra212 FPS116 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetCore i5-10600Ryzen 3 3300X
1080p
low339 FPS336 FPS
medium339 FPS336 FPS
high339 FPS336 FPS
ultra339 FPS336 FPS
1440p
low339 FPS336 FPS
medium339 FPS336 FPS
high339 FPS336 FPS
ultra339 FPS332 FPS
4K
low339 FPS336 FPS
medium339 FPS309 FPS
high339 FPS258 FPS
ultra295 FPS203 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetCore i5-10600Ryzen 3 3300X
1080p
low339 FPS336 FPS
medium339 FPS336 FPS
high339 FPS336 FPS
ultra339 FPS336 FPS
1440p
low339 FPS336 FPS
medium339 FPS336 FPS
high339 FPS336 FPS
ultra339 FPS336 FPS
4K
low339 FPS336 FPS
medium339 FPS336 FPS
high339 FPS336 FPS
ultra339 FPS331 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-10600 and Ryzen 3 3300X

Intel

Core i5-10600

The Core i5-10600 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 13,573 points. Launch price was $149.

AMD

Ryzen 3 3300X

The Ryzen 3 3300X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 24 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 13,425 points. Launch price was $120.

Processing Power

The Core i5-10600 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 3 3300X offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Core i5-10600 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Core i5-10600 versus 4.3 GHz on the Ryzen 3 3300X — a 11% clock advantage for the Core i5-10600 (base: 3.3 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Core i5-10600 uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 3 3300X uses Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-10600 scores 13,573 against the Ryzen 3 3300X's 13,425 — a 1.1% lead for the Core i5-10600. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10600 vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 3300X.

FeatureCore i5-10600Ryzen 3 3300X
Cores / Threads
6 / 12+50%
4 / 8
Boost Clock
4.8 GHz+12%
4.3 GHz
Base Clock
3.3 GHz
3.8 GHz+15%
L3 Cache
12 MB (total)
16 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
512K (per core)+100%
Process
14 nm
7 nm-50%
Architecture
Comet Lake (2020−2025)
Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020)
PassMark
13,573+1%
13,425
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-10600 uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 3 3300X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i5-10600Ryzen 3 3300X
Socket
LGA1200
AM4
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
24
💰

Value Analysis

The Core i5-10600 launched at $244 MSRP, while the Ryzen 3 3300X debuted at $120. On MSRP ($244 vs $120), the Ryzen 3 3300X is $124 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-10600 delivers 55.6 pts/$ vs 111.9 pts/$ for the Ryzen 3 3300X — making the Ryzen 3 3300X the 67.2% better value option.

FeatureCore i5-10600Ryzen 3 3300X
MSRP
$244
$120-51%
Performance per Dollar
55.6
111.9+101%
Release Date
2020
2020