Core i5-11300H vs Core i7-9750H

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-11300H

2021

Why buy it

✅+1.7% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-9750H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).

Core i7-9750H

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +7.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (10,611 vs 10,792).

Core i5-11300H

2021

Core i7-9750H

2019

Why buy it

✅+1.7% higher PassMark.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +7.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-9750H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (10,611 vs 10,792).

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-11300H better than Core i7-9750H?

It depends on what matters more to you. For gaming, Core i7-9750H is ahead with a 7.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-11300H pulls ahead with 1.7% better PassMark. Core i7-9750H also has the bigger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-11300H is the better fit. You are getting 1.7% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-11300H still looks like the safer overall buy. Core i5-11300H is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you 1.7% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-11300H is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2019) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 6/12. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i5-11300H Benchmark Check

Core i7-9750H Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i5-11300H	Core i7-9750H
1080p
low	176 FPS	179 FPS
medium	147 FPS	147 FPS
high	119 FPS	119 FPS
ultra	97 FPS	97 FPS
1440p
low	151 FPS	152 FPS
medium	122 FPS	124 FPS
high	98 FPS	100 FPS
ultra	79 FPS	82 FPS
4K
low	85 FPS	85 FPS
medium	75 FPS	75 FPS
high	58 FPS	60 FPS
ultra	45 FPS	46 FPS

Open Core i5-11300H Open Core i7-9750H

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i5-11300H	Core i7-9750H
1080p
low	270 FPS	265 FPS
medium	267 FPS	265 FPS
high	238 FPS	265 FPS
ultra	201 FPS	265 FPS
1440p
low	270 FPS	265 FPS
medium	236 FPS	265 FPS
high	214 FPS	265 FPS
ultra	178 FPS	241 FPS
4K
low	225 FPS	265 FPS
medium	189 FPS	259 FPS
high	157 FPS	236 FPS
ultra	128 FPS	197 FPS

Open Core i5-11300H Open Core i7-9750H

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i5-11300H	Core i7-9750H
1080p
low	270 FPS	265 FPS
medium	270 FPS	265 FPS
high	270 FPS	265 FPS
ultra	270 FPS	265 FPS
1440p
low	270 FPS	265 FPS
medium	270 FPS	265 FPS
high	270 FPS	265 FPS
ultra	270 FPS	265 FPS
4K
low	270 FPS	265 FPS
medium	270 FPS	265 FPS
high	270 FPS	265 FPS
ultra	255 FPS	239 FPS

Open Core i5-11300H Open Core i7-9750H

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i5-11300H	Core i7-9750H
1080p
low	270 FPS	265 FPS
medium	270 FPS	265 FPS
high	270 FPS	265 FPS
ultra	270 FPS	265 FPS
1440p
low	270 FPS	265 FPS
medium	270 FPS	265 FPS
high	270 FPS	265 FPS
ultra	270 FPS	265 FPS
4K
low	270 FPS	265 FPS
medium	270 FPS	265 FPS
high	270 FPS	265 FPS
ultra	270 FPS	265 FPS

Open Core i5-11300H Open Core i7-9750H

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-11300H and Core i7-9750H

Core i5-11300H

The Core i5-11300H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 January 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-H35 (2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm SuperFin process technology. Socket: FCBGA1449. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 10,792 points. Launch price was $149.

Core i7-9750H

The Core i7-9750H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-HR (2019) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 10,611 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-11300H packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Core i7-9750H offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i7-9750H has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-11300H versus 4.5 GHz on the Core i7-9750H — a 2.2% clock advantage for the Core i7-9750H (base: 2.6 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Core i5-11300H uses the Tiger Lake-H35 (2021) architecture (10 nm SuperFin), while the Core i7-9750H uses Coffee Lake-HR (2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-11300H scores 10,792 against the Core i7-9750H's 10,611 — a 1.7% lead for the Core i5-11300H. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i5-11300H vs 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-9750H.

Feature	Core i5-11300H	Core i7-9750H
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	6 / 12+50%
Boost Clock	4.4 GHz	4.5 GHz+2%
Base Clock	2.6 GHz	2.6 GHz
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	12 MB (total)+50%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)+400%	256K (per core)
Process	10 nm SuperFin-29%	14 nm
Architecture	Tiger Lake-H35 (2021)	Coffee Lake-HR (2019)
PassMark	10,792+2%	10,611

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-11300H uses the FCBGA1449 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core i7-9750H uses BGA1440 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.