Core i5-11600T vs Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G

Intel

Core i5-11600T

6 Cores12 Thrd35 WWMax: 4.1 GHz2021
Core family
·······
VS
AMD

Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G

4 Cores8 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.9 GHz2024
Similar parts
·······

Core i5-11600T vs Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-11600T vs Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-11600T vs Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-11600T

2021

Why buy it

  • +50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
  • Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with UHD 750, while Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G needs a discrete GPU.
  • Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (14,447 vs 14,540).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 55.1 vs 82.6 PassMark/$ ($262 MSRP vs $176 MSRP).
  • Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G moves to AM5 and DDR5.

Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G

2024

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +16.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Costs $86 less on MSRP ($176 MSRP vs $262 MSRP).
  • Delivers 49.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 82.6 vs 55.1 PassMark/$ ($176 MSRP vs $262 MSRP).
  • Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

  • Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).
  • 85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
  • No integrated graphics, while Core i5-11600T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
  • No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-11600T.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G better than Core i5-11600T?
Yes. Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 16.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.6% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 16.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G is the better buy right now. Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G comes in $86 cheaper on MSRP at $176 MSRP versus $262 MSRP, and it still gives you a 16.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 49.8% better value on MSRP (82.6 vs 55.1 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper. That said, if you already own a compatible LGA1200 + DDR4 setup, Core i5-11600T can still make sense as a platform-matched option because it avoids a motherboard and RAM swap, but on MSRP alone you would want to find it meaningfully cheaper in real-world listings before that path becomes easy to justify.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2021), a healthier platform with AM5 and DDR5 instead of LGA1200, and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 6/12. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i5-11600T vs Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core i5-11600T

The Core i5-11600T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Rocket Lake (2021) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 14,447 points. Launch price was $149.

AMD

Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G

The Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 16 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Phoenix2 (2024) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 14,540 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

The Core i5-11600T packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Core i5-11600T has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.1 GHz on the Core i5-11600T versus 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G — a 17.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G (base: 1.7 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Core i5-11600T uses the Rocket Lake (2021) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G uses Phoenix2 (2024) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-11600T scores 14,447 against the Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G's 14,540 — a 0.6% lead for the Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-11600T vs 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G.

FeatureCore i5-11600TRyzen 3 PRO 8300G
Cores / Threads
6 / 12+50%
4 / 8
Boost Clock
4.1 GHz
4.9 GHz+20%
Base Clock
1.7 GHz
3.4 GHz+100%
L3 Cache
12 MB (total)+50%
8 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256K (per core)+25500%
1 MB (per core)
Process
14 nm
4 nm-71%
Architecture
Rocket Lake (2021)
Phoenix2 (2024)
PassMark
14,447
14,540
Geekbench 6 Single
1,856
Geekbench 6 Multi
6,455
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-11600T uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G uses AM5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i5-11600TRyzen 3 PRO 8300G
Socket
LGA1200
AM5
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
20
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-11600T) / not specified (Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G). The Core i5-11600T includes integrated graphics (UHD 750), while the Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-11600T targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-11600T rivals Ryzen 5 5600G.

FeatureCore i5-11600TRyzen 3 PRO 8300G
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
UHD 750
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Gaming
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i5-11600T was priced at $262, while the Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G came in at $176. On launch pricing ($262 vs $176), Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G was $86 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-11600T delivers 55.1 pts/$ vs 82.6 pts/$ for the Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G — making the Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G the 39.9% better value option.

FeatureCore i5-11600TRyzen 3 PRO 8300G
MSRP
$262
$176-33%
Performance per Dollar
55.1
82.6+50%
Release Date
2021
2024

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.