Core i5-11600T vs Ryzen 7 5825C

Intel

Core i5-11600T

6 Cores12 Thrd35 WWMax: 4.1 GHz2021
Core family
·······
VS
AMD

Ryzen 7 5825C

8 Cores16 Thrd15 WWMax: 4.5 GHz2022
Ryzen family
·······

Core i5-11600T vs Ryzen 7 5825C Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-11600T vs Ryzen 7 5825C FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-11600T vs Ryzen 7 5825C: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-11600T

2021

Why buy it

  • Costs $138 less on MSRP ($262 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
  • Delivers 51.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 55.1 vs 36.4 PassMark/$ ($262 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
  • 150% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 7 5825C.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5825C across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower Geekbench multi-core (6,455 vs 7,145).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
  • 133.3% higher power demand at 35W vs 15W.

Ryzen 7 5825C

2022

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +18.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
  • Draws 15W instead of 35W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 36.4 vs 55.1 PassMark/$ ($400 MSRP vs $262 MSRP).
  • No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-11600T.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 5825C better than Core i5-11600T?
Yes. Ryzen 7 5825C is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 18.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 10.7% better Geekbench multi-core, 0.8% higher PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 7 5825C is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 18.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 7 5825C is the stronger fit. You are getting 10.7% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Ryzen 7 5825C is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i5-11600T is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Ryzen 7 5825C comes in 52.7% more expensive on MSRP at $400 MSRP versus $262 MSRP, and it still gives you a 18.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-11600T is also 51.5% better value on MSRP (55.1 vs 36.4 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 7 5825C makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2021), 33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 6/12. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i5-11600T vs Ryzen 7 5825C Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core i5-11600T

The Core i5-11600T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Rocket Lake (2021) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 14,447 points. Launch price was $149.

AMD

Ryzen 7 5825C

The Ryzen 7 5825C is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 May 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Barcelo (Zen 3) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 14,561 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

The Core i5-11600T packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 7 5825C offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 7 5825C has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.1 GHz on the Core i5-11600T versus 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5825C — a 9.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 5825C (base: 1.7 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core i5-11600T uses the Rocket Lake (2021) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 7 5825C uses Barcelo (Zen 3) (2022−2023) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-11600T scores 14,447 against the Ryzen 7 5825C's 14,561 — a 0.8% lead for the Ryzen 7 5825C. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,856 vs 1,961, a 5.5% lead for the Ryzen 7 5825C that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 6,455 vs 7,145 (10.1% advantage for the Ryzen 7 5825C). L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-11600T vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 5825C.

FeatureCore i5-11600TRyzen 7 5825C
Cores / Threads
6 / 12
8 / 16+33%
Boost Clock
4.1 GHz
4.5 GHz+10%
Base Clock
1.7 GHz
2 GHz+18%
L3 Cache
12 MB (total)
16 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
512K (per core)+100%
Process
14 nm
7 nm-50%
Architecture
Rocket Lake (2021)
Barcelo (Zen 3) (2022−2023)
PassMark
14,447
14,561
Cinebench R23 Multi
9,551
Geekbench 6 Single
1,856
1,961+6%
Geekbench 6 Multi
6,455
7,145+11%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-11600T uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 7 5825C uses FP6 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-3200 memory speed. The Core i5-11600T supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-11600T) vs 8 (Ryzen 7 5825C) — the Core i5-11600T offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H470,Z490,B560,Z590 (Core i5-11600T) and SoC (Ryzen 7 5825C).

FeatureCore i5-11600TRyzen 7 5825C
Socket
LGA1200
FP6
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-3200
DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB+100%
64 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
No
No
PCIe Lanes
20+150%
8
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Core i5-11600T supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-11600T) vs Yes (Ryzen 7 5825C). Both include integrated graphics UHD 750 (Core i5-11600T) and Radeon Vega 8 (Ryzen 7 5825C) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-11600T targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-11600T rivals Ryzen 5 5600G.

FeatureCore i5-11600TRyzen 7 5825C
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
UHD 750
Radeon Vega 8
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
Yes
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Yes
Target Use
Gaming
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i5-11600T was priced at $262, while the Ryzen 7 5825C came in at $400. On launch pricing ($262 vs $400), Core i5-11600T was $138 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-11600T delivers 55.1 pts/$ vs 36.4 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 5825C — making the Core i5-11600T the 40.9% better value option.

FeatureCore i5-11600TRyzen 7 5825C
MSRP
$262-35%
$400
Performance per Dollar
55.1+51%
36.4
Release Date
2021
2022

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.