Core i5-11600T vs Xeon W-2135

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-11600T vs Xeon W-2135 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-11600T vs Xeon W-2135: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-11600T

2021

Why buy it

✅+0.4% higher PassMark.
✅+45.5% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8.3 MB).
✅Draws 35W instead of 140W, a 105W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD 750, while Xeon W-2135 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-2135 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Launch MSRP is still $262 MSRP, while Xeon W-2135 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon W-2135

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +9.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (14,396 vs 14,447).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8.3 MB vs 12 MB).
❌300% higher power demand at 140W vs 35W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-11600T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-11600T.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-11600T better than Xeon W-2135?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon W-2135 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-11600T is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-11600T is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 45.5% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8.3 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-11600T is the better buy right now. Core i5-11600T comes in at an unclear MSRP at $262 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.4% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon W-2135 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 9.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (55.1 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-11600T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2017), 45.5% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8.3 MB), more multi-core headroom with 6 cores / 12 threads instead of 6/12, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i5-11600T vs Xeon W-2135 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-11600T

The Core i5-11600T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Rocket Lake (2021) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 14,447 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon W-2135

The Xeon W-2135 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 August 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 8.25 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400, DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 14,396 points. Launch price was $835.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i5-11600T and Xeon W-2135 share an identical 6-core/12-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.1 GHz on the Core i5-11600T versus 4.5 GHz on the Xeon W-2135 — a 9.3% clock advantage for the Xeon W-2135 (base: 1.7 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The Core i5-11600T uses the Rocket Lake (2021) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon W-2135 uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-11600T scores 14,447 against the Xeon W-2135's 14,396 — a 0.4% lead for the Core i5-11600T. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-11600T vs 8.25 MB (total) on the Xeon W-2135.

Feature	Core i5-11600T	Xeon W-2135
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	6 / 12
Boost Clock	4.1 GHz	4.5 GHz+10%
Base Clock	1.7 GHz	3.7 GHz+118%
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)+45%	8.25 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+25500%	1 MB (per core)
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Rocket Lake (2021)	Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
PassMark	14,447	14,396
Geekbench 6 Single	1,856	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	6,455	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-11600T uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-2135 uses LGA2066 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i5-11600T	Xeon W-2135
Socket	LGA1200	LGA2066
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200	—
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	20	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-11600T) / not specified (Xeon W-2135). The Core i5-11600T includes integrated graphics (UHD 750), while the Xeon W-2135 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-11600T targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-11600T rivals Ryzen 5 5600G.