
Core i5-12400F

Xeon Gold 6248R
Core i5-12400F vs Xeon Gold 6248R Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-12400F vs Xeon Gold 6248R FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-12400F vs Xeon Gold 6248R: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-12400F
2022Why buy it
- β Costs $2,526 less on MSRP ($174 MSRP vs $2,700 MSRP).
- β Delivers 755.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 112.3 vs 13.1 PassMark/$ ($174 MSRP vs $2,700 MSRP).
- β Draws 65W instead of 205W, a 140W reduction.
- β Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.
- β Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon Gold 6248R.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 6248R across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (19,532 vs 35,434).
- βSmaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 36 MB).
- βLess compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6248R, which brings 24 cores / 48 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.
Xeon Gold 6248R
2020Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +9.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β +98.6% larger total L3 cache (36 MB vs 18 MB).
- β Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 24 cores / 48 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 20.
- β 140% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 13.1 vs 112.3 PassMark/$ ($2,700 MSRP vs $174 MSRP).
- β215.4% higher power demand at 205W vs 65W.
- βOlder platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Core i5-12400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
- βNo boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon Gold 6248R better than Core i5-12400F?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-12400F vs Xeon Gold 6248R Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-12400F
The Core i5-12400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,532 points. Launch price was $180.

Xeon Gold 6248R
The Xeon Gold 6248R is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019β2020) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 35.75 MB. L2 cache: 24 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 35,434 points. Launch price was $2,700.
Processing Power
The Core i5-12400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6248R offers 24 cores / 48 threads β the Xeon Gold 6248R has 18 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-12400F versus 4 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6248R β a 9.5% clock advantage for the Core i5-12400F (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Core i5-12400F uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6248R uses Cascade Lake (2019β2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-12400F scores 19,532 against the Xeon Gold 6248R's 35,434 β a 57.9% lead for the Xeon Gold 6248R. L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core i5-12400F vs 35.75 MB on the Xeon Gold 6248R.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Xeon Gold 6248R |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 24 / 48+300% |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz+10% | 4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 3 GHz+20% |
| L3 Cache | 18 MB (total) | 35.75 MB+99% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 24 MB+1820% |
| Process | Intel 7 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Alder Lake-S (2022) | Cascade Lake (2019β2020) |
| PassMark | 19,532 | 35,434+81% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 12,380 | β |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,700 | β |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 657 | β |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-12400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon Gold 6248R uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-12400F versus 2933 on the Xeon Gold 6248R β the Core i5-12400F supports 63.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Gold 6248R supports up to 1024 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB β 700% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i5-12400F) vs 6 (Xeon Gold 6248R). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-12400F) vs 48 (Xeon Gold 6248R) β the Xeon Gold 6248R offers 28 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-12400F) and C621 (Xeon Gold 6248R).
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Xeon Gold 6248R |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200+64% | 2933 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 1024 GB+700% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 6+200% |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 48+140% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-12400F) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Gold 6248R). Primary use case: Core i5-12400F targets Gaming Performance/Value. Direct competitor: Core i5-12400F rivals Ryzen 5 5600; Xeon Gold 6248R rivals EPYC 7402.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Xeon Gold 6248R |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | β | None |
| Unlocked | β | No |
| AVX-512 | β | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Gaming Performance/Value | β |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i5-12400F was priced at $174, while the Xeon Gold 6248R came in at $2700. On launch pricing ($174 vs $2700), Core i5-12400F was $2526 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-12400F delivers 112.3 pts/$ vs 13.1 pts/$ for the Xeon Gold 6248R β making the Core i5-12400F the 158.1% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Xeon Gold 6248R |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $174-94% | $2700 |
| Performance per Dollar | 112.3+757% | 13.1 |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2020 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














