
Core i5-14500HX
Popular choices:

Core i7-12700K
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-14500HX
2024Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-12700K across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (28,383 vs 34,347).
Core i7-12700K
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +7.9% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $409 MSRP, while Core i5-14500HX mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Core i5-14500HX
2024Core i7-12700K
2021Why buy it
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +7.9% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-12700K across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (28,383 vs 34,347).
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $409 MSRP, while Core i5-14500HX mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-12700K better than Core i5-14500HX?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-14500HX | Core i7-12700K |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 259 FPS | 314 FPS |
| medium | 249 FPS | 295 FPS |
| high | 207 FPS | 246 FPS |
| ultra | 177 FPS | 193 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 221 FPS | 269 FPS |
| medium | 190 FPS | 225 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 182 FPS |
| ultra | 132 FPS | 145 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 170 FPS |
| medium | 130 FPS | 142 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 109 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 96 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-14500HX | Core i7-12700K |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 557 FPS | 630 FPS |
| medium | 472 FPS | 533 FPS |
| high | 400 FPS | 450 FPS |
| ultra | 369 FPS | 410 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 458 FPS | 536 FPS |
| medium | 403 FPS | 475 FPS |
| high | 350 FPS | 403 FPS |
| ultra | 306 FPS | 349 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 281 FPS | 312 FPS |
| medium | 248 FPS | 280 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 266 FPS |
| ultra | 208 FPS | 234 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-14500HX | Core i7-12700K |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 647 FPS | 797 FPS |
| medium | 527 FPS | 633 FPS |
| high | 466 FPS | 556 FPS |
| ultra | 404 FPS | 472 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 590 FPS | 704 FPS |
| medium | 485 FPS | 565 FPS |
| high | 424 FPS | 490 FPS |
| ultra | 370 FPS | 422 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 433 FPS | 510 FPS |
| medium | 372 FPS | 425 FPS |
| high | 334 FPS | 381 FPS |
| ultra | 285 FPS | 321 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-14500HX | Core i7-12700K |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 710 FPS | 859 FPS |
| medium | 710 FPS | 802 FPS |
| high | 707 FPS | 699 FPS |
| ultra | 628 FPS | 628 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 710 FPS | 760 FPS |
| medium | 682 FPS | 678 FPS |
| high | 592 FPS | 590 FPS |
| ultra | 515 FPS | 519 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 539 FPS | 535 FPS |
| medium | 490 FPS | 488 FPS |
| high | 437 FPS | 437 FPS |
| ultra | 380 FPS | 384 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-14500HX and Core i7-12700K

Core i5-14500HX
Core i5-14500HX
The Core i5-14500HX is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-HX Refresh (2024) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1964. Thermal design power (TDP): + 24 MB. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 28,383 points. Launch price was $299.

Core i7-12700K
Core i7-12700K
The Core i7-12700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 November 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake, Golden Cove, Gracemont (2021) architecture. It features 12 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 34,347 points. Launch price was $409.
Processing Power
The Core i5-14500HX packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Core i7-12700K offers 12 cores / 20 threads — the Core i5-14500HX has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core i5-14500HX versus 5 GHz on the Core i7-12700K — a 2% clock advantage for the Core i7-12700K (base: 2.6 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Core i5-14500HX uses the Raptor Lake-HX Refresh (2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core i7-12700K uses Alder Lake, Golden Cove, Gracemont (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-14500HX scores 28,383 against the Core i7-12700K's 34,347 — a 19% lead for the Core i7-12700K. L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core i5-14500HX vs 25 MB (total) on the Core i7-12700K.
| Feature | Core i5-14500HX | Core i7-12700K |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 20+17% | 12 / 20 |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz | 5 GHz+2% |
| Base Clock | 2.6 GHz | 3.6 GHz+38% |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB (total) | 25 MB (total)+4% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+60% | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm-30% | 10 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-HX Refresh (2024) | Alder Lake, Golden Cove, Gracemont (2021) |
| PassMark | 28,383 | 34,347+21% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,409 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 13,150 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-14500HX uses the FCBGA1964 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core i7-12700K uses LGA1700 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Core i5-14500HX versus 4800 on the Core i7-12700K — the Core i7-12700K supports 199.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-14500HX supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: HM770 (Core i5-14500HX) and Z690,B660 (Core i7-12700K).
| Feature | Core i5-14500HX | Core i7-12700K |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1964 | LGA1700 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600 | 4800+95900% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB+157286300% | 128 |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 20 |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Both include integrated graphics — Intel UHD Graphics (Core i5-14500HX) and Intel UHD Graphics 770 (Core i7-12700K) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-14500HX targets Gaming Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i7-12700K rivals Ryzen 7 5800X.
| Feature | Core i5-14500HX | Core i7-12700K |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics | Intel UHD Graphics 770 |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Gaming Laptop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













