
Core i5-14500T

Ryzen 5 240
Core i5-14500T vs Ryzen 5 240 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-14500T vs Ryzen 5 240 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-14500T vs Ryzen 5 240: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-14500T
2024Why buy it
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 45W, a 10W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 770, while Ryzen 5 240 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 240 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,889 vs 23,167).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $232 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 240 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Ryzen 5 240
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +14.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 24 MB).
- ❌28.6% higher power demand at 45W vs 35W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-14500T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 240 better than Core i5-14500T?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-14500T vs Ryzen 5 240 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-14500T
The Core i5-14500T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 22,889 points. Launch price was $232.


Ryzen 5 240
The Ryzen 5 240 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 4.3 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 23,167 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i5-14500T packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Ryzen 5 240 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i5-14500T has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Core i5-14500T versus 5 GHz on the Ryzen 5 240 — a 4.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 240 (base: 1.7 GHz vs 4.3 GHz). The Core i5-14500T uses the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 5 240 uses Hawk Point (2024−2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-14500T scores 22,889 against the Ryzen 5 240's 23,167 — a 1.2% lead for the Ryzen 5 240. L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core i5-14500T vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 240.
| Feature | Core i5-14500T | Ryzen 5 240 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 20+133% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz | 5 GHz+4% |
| Base Clock | 1.7 GHz | 4.3 GHz+153% |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB (total)+50% | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+25% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 4 nm-43% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) | Hawk Point (2024−2025) |
| PassMark | 22,889 | 23,167+1% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,561 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-14500T uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 5 240 uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-14500T | Ryzen 5 240 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | FP8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-14500T) / not specified (Ryzen 5 240). The Core i5-14500T includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 770), while the Ryzen 5 240 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-14500T targets Low Power Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i5-14500T rivals Ryzen 5 7600.
| Feature | Core i5-14500T | Ryzen 5 240 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 770 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | — |
| Target Use | Low Power Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i5-14500T was priced at $232, while the Ryzen 5 240 came in at $0. On launch pricing ($232 vs $0), Ryzen 5 240 was $232 cheaper.
| Feature | Core i5-14500T | Ryzen 5 240 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $232 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 98.7 | — |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2025 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













