
Core i5-3337U

Phenom II X4 820
Core i5-3337U vs Phenom II X4 820 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-3337U vs Phenom II X4 820 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-3337U vs Phenom II X4 820: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-3337U
2013Why buy it
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 4000, while Phenom II X4 820 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (2,093 vs 2,114).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 4 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.3 vs 14.1 PassMark/$ ($225 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ❌438.9% higher power demand at 512W vs 95W.
Phenom II X4 820
2009Why buy it
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB).
- ✅Costs $75 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $225 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 51.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 14.1 vs 9.3 PassMark/$ ($150 MSRP vs $225 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 95W instead of 512W, a 417W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-3337U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Phenom II X4 820 better than Core i5-3337U?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-3337U vs Phenom II X4 820 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-3337U
The Core i5-3337U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3/L/-RS 1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 2,093 points. Launch price was $225.

Phenom II X4 820
The Phenom II X4 820 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 September 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Deneb (2009−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,114 points. Launch price was $90.
Processing Power
The Core i5-3337U packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Phenom II X4 820 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Phenom II X4 820 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.7 GHz on the Core i5-3337U versus 2.8 GHz on the Phenom II X4 820 — a 3.6% clock advantage for the Phenom II X4 820 (base: 1.8 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Core i5-3337U uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Phenom II X4 820 uses Deneb (2009−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-3337U scores 2,093 against the Phenom II X4 820's 2,114 — a 1% lead for the Phenom II X4 820. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Core i5-3337U vs 4 MB (total) on the Phenom II X4 820.
| Feature | Core i5-3337U | Phenom II X4 820 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 4 / 4+100% |
| Boost Clock | 2.7 GHz | 2.8 GHz+4% |
| Base Clock | 1.8 GHz | 2.8 GHz+56% |
| L3 Cache | 3 MB (total) | 4 MB (total)+33% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 512 kB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 22 nm-51% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) | Deneb (2009−2011) |
| PassMark | 2,093 | 2,114+1% |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-3337U uses the BGA1023 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Phenom II X4 820 uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-3337U | Phenom II X4 820 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | BGA1023 | AM3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 1600 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: true (Core i5-3337U) / not specified (Phenom II X4 820). The Core i5-3337U includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 4000), while the Phenom II X4 820 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i5-3337U rivals AMD A8-4555M.
| Feature | Core i5-3337U | Phenom II X4 820 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Intel HD Graphics 4000 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | true | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i5-3337U was priced at $225, while the Phenom II X4 820 came in at $150. On launch pricing ($225 vs $150), Phenom II X4 820 was $75 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-3337U delivers 9.3 pts/$ vs 14.1 pts/$ for the Phenom II X4 820 — making the Phenom II X4 820 the 41% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-3337U | Phenom II X4 820 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $225 | $150-33% |
| Performance per Dollar | 9.3 | 14.1+52% |
| Release Date | 2013 | 2009 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















