Core i5-3380M vs Core i5-4300M

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-3380M vs Core i5-4300M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-3380M vs Core i5-4300M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-3380M

2013

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 4000, while Core i5-4300M needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,938 vs 2,960).

Core i5-4300M

2013

Why buy it

✅+0.7% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $227 MSRP, while Core i5-3380M mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-3380M can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-4300M better than Core i5-3380M?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i5-3380M is ahead with a 0.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-4300M pulls ahead with 0.7% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-4300M is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-4300M is the better buy right now. Core i5-4300M comes in at an unclear MSRP at $227 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.7% better PassMark. The compromise is that Core i5-3380M is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 0.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (13.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-4300M makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i5-3380M vs Core i5-4300M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-3380M

The Core i5-3380M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,938 points. Launch price was $69.

Core i5-4300M

The Core i5-4300M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA946. Thermal design power (TDP): 37 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,960 points. Launch price was $227.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i5-3380M and Core i5-4300M share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Core i5-3380M versus 3.3 GHz on the Core i5-4300M — a 8.7% clock advantage for the Core i5-3380M (base: 2.9 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Core i5-3380M uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Core i5-4300M uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-3380M scores 2,938 against the Core i5-4300M's 2,960 — a 0.7% lead for the Core i5-4300M. Both processors carry 3 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	Core i5-3380M	Core i5-4300M
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	2 / 4
Boost Clock	3.6 GHz+9%	3.3 GHz
Base Clock	2.9 GHz+12%	2.6 GHz
L3 Cache	3 MB (total)	3 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	256K (per core)
Process	22 nm	22 nm
Architecture	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)	Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark	2,938	2,960
Geekbench 6 Single	700	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,600	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-3380M uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-4300M uses PGA946 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i5-3380M	Core i5-4300M
Socket	PGA988	PGA946
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-3380M) / not specified (Core i5-4300M). The Core i5-3380M includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 4000), while the Core i5-4300M requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-3380M targets Business Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i5-3380M rivals AMD A10-4600M.