Core i5-3380M vs Xeon X5492

Intel

Core i5-3380M

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2013
VS
Intel

Xeon X5492

150 WW2008

Core i5-3380M vs Xeon X5492 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-3380M vs Xeon X5492 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-3380M vs Xeon X5492: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-3380M

2013

Why buy it

  • βœ…+0.9% higher PassMark.
  • βœ…100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • βœ…Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 4000, while Xeon X5492 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon X5492 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • ❌Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 12 MB).
  • ❌241.3% higher power demand at 512W vs 150W.

Xeon X5492

2008

Why buy it

  • βœ…Better for gaming: +10.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • βœ…+300% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 3 MB).
  • βœ…Draws 150W instead of 512W, a 362W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower PassMark (2,912 vs 2,938).
  • ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-3380M can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-3380M better than Xeon X5492?
Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon X5492 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-3380M is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-3380M is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i5-3380M still makes the most sense overall. Core i5-3380M comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.9% better PassMark.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-3380M makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2008). That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i5-3380M vs Xeon X5492 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core i5-3380M

The Core i5-3380M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012βˆ’2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,938 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Xeon X5492

The Xeon X5492 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. Base frequency: 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB L2 Cache. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA771. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 2,912 points. Launch price was $800.

⚑

Processing Power

The Core i5-3380M is built on the Ivy Bridge (2012βˆ’2013) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i5-3380M scores 2,938 against the Xeon X5492's 2,912 β€” a 0.9% lead for the Core i5-3380M. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Core i5-3380M vs 12 MB L2 Cache on the Xeon X5492.

FeatureCore i5-3380MXeon X5492
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
β€”
Boost Clock
3.6 GHz
β€”
Base Clock
2.9 GHz
3.4 GHz+17%
L3 Cache
3 MB (total)
12 MB L2 Cache+300%
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
β€”
Process
22 nm-51%
45 nm
Architecture
Ivy Bridge (2012βˆ’2013)
β€”
PassMark
2,938
2,912
Geekbench 6 Single
700
β€”
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,600
β€”
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-3380M uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon X5492 uses LGA771 (PCIe 2.0) β€” making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i5-3380MXeon X5492
Socket
PGA988
LGA771
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1600
β€”
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
β€”
RAM Channels
2
β€”
ECC Support
No
β€”
PCIe Lanes
16
β€”
πŸ”§

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-3380M) / not specified (Xeon X5492). The Core i5-3380M includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 4000), while the Xeon X5492 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-3380M targets Business Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i5-3380M rivals AMD A10-4600M.

FeatureCore i5-3380MXeon X5492
Integrated GPU
Yes
β€”
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics 4000
β€”
Unlocked
No
β€”
AVX-512
No
β€”
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
β€”
Target Use
Business Laptop
β€”