
Core i5-4300M

Ryzen 7 3700X
Core i5-4300M vs Ryzen 7 3700X Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-4300M vs Ryzen 7 3700X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-4300M vs Ryzen 7 3700X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-4300M
2013Why buy it
- ✅Costs $102 less on MSRP ($227 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (2,960 vs 22,430).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.0 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($227 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ❌687.7% higher power demand at 512W vs 65W.
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +282.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+966.7% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 3 MB).
- ✅Delivers 422.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 13.0 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $227 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 512W, a 447W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌44.9% HIGHER MSRP$329 MSRPvs$227 MSRP
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 3700X better than Core i5-4300M?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-4300M vs Ryzen 7 3700X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-4300M
The Core i5-4300M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA946. Thermal design power (TDP): 37 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,960 points. Launch price was $227.


Ryzen 7 3700X
The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.
Processing Power
The Core i5-4300M packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Ryzen 7 3700X offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 7 3700X has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the Core i5-4300M versus 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X — a 28.6% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 3700X (base: 2.6 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Core i5-4300M uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Ryzen 7 3700X uses Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-4300M scores 2,960 against the Ryzen 7 3700X's 22,430 — a 153.4% lead for the Ryzen 7 3700X. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Core i5-4300M vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X.
| Feature | Core i5-4300M | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 8 / 16+300% |
| Boost Clock | 3.3 GHz | 4.4 GHz+33% |
| Base Clock | 2.6 GHz | 3.6 GHz+38% |
| L3 Cache | 3 MB (total) | 32 MB+967% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 512K (per core)+100% |
| Process | 22 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm-68% |
| Architecture | Haswell (2013−2015) | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 2,960 | 22,430+658% |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-4300M uses the PGA946 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 7 3700X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-4300M | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | PGA946 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 24 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i5-4300M was priced at $227, while the Ryzen 7 3700X came in at $329. On launch pricing ($227 vs $329), Core i5-4300M was $102 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-4300M delivers 13.0 pts/$ vs 68.2 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 3700X — making the Ryzen 7 3700X the 135.8% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-4300M | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $227-31% | $329 |
| Performance per Dollar | 13.0 | 68.2+425% |
| Release Date | 2013 | 2019 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














