
Athlon X4 760K

Core i5-4300M
Athlon X4 760K vs Core i5-4300M Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Athlon X4 760K vs Core i5-4300M FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

Call of Duty: Warzone
Athlon X4 760K vs Core i5-4300M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Athlon X4 760K
2013Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.2% higher average FPS across 45 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $127 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $227 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 128.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 29.8 vs 13.0 PassMark/$ ($100 MSRP vs $227 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 512W, a 412W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Core i5-4300M
2013Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Athlon X4 760K across 45 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (2,960 vs 2,982).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.0 vs 29.8 PassMark/$ ($227 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
- ❌412% higher power demand at 512W vs 100W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Athlon X4 760K.
Quick Answers
So, is Athlon X4 760K better than Core i5-4300M?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Athlon X4 760K vs Core i5-4300M Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon X4 760K
The Athlon X4 760K is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 100 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 2,982 points. Launch price was $149.

Core i5-4300M
The Core i5-4300M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA946. Thermal design power (TDP): 37 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,960 points. Launch price was $227.
Processing Power
The Athlon X4 760K packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i5-4300M offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Athlon X4 760K has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.1 GHz on the Athlon X4 760K versus 3.3 GHz on the Core i5-4300M — a 21.6% clock advantage for the Athlon X4 760K (base: 3.8 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Athlon X4 760K uses the Richland (2013−2014) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i5-4300M uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon X4 760K scores 2,982 against the Core i5-4300M's 2,960 — a 0.7% lead for the Athlon X4 760K.
| Feature | Athlon X4 760K | Core i5-4300M |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4+100% | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 4.1 GHz+24% | 3.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.8 GHz+46% | 2.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | — | 3 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 256K (per core)+6300% |
| Process | 32 nm | 22 nm-31% |
| Architecture | Richland (2013−2014) | Haswell (2013−2015) |
| PassMark | 2,982 | 2,960 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 495 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,404 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon X4 760K uses the FM2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-4300M uses PGA946 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Athlon X4 760K | Core i5-4300M |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FM2 | PGA946 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1866 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (Athlon X4 760K) / not specified (Core i5-4300M). Primary use case: Athlon X4 760K targets Budget.
| Feature | Athlon X4 760K | Core i5-4300M |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | — |
| Target Use | Budget | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Athlon X4 760K was priced at $100, while the Core i5-4300M came in at $227. On launch pricing ($100 vs $227), Athlon X4 760K was $127 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon X4 760K delivers 29.8 pts/$ vs 13.0 pts/$ for the Core i5-4300M — making the Athlon X4 760K the 78.3% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon X4 760K | Core i5-4300M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100-56% | $227 |
| Performance per Dollar | 29.8+129% | 13.0 |
| Release Date | 2013 | 2013 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















