Athlon X4 760K vs Core i5-4300M

AMD

Athlon X4 760K

4 Cores4 Thrd100 WWMax: 4.1 GHz2013
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Core i5-4300M

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 3.3 GHz2013
Similar parts
·······

Athlon X4 760K vs Core i5-4300M Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon X4 760K vs Core i5-4300M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon X4 760K vs Core i5-4300M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon X4 760K

2013

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +8.2% higher average FPS across 45 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Costs $127 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $227 MSRP).
  • Delivers 128.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 29.8 vs 13.0 PassMark/$ ($100 MSRP vs $227 MSRP).
  • Draws 100W instead of 512W, a 412W reduction.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Core i5-4300M

2013

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Athlon X4 760K across 45 shared CPU benchmark tests.
    • Lower PassMark (2,960 vs 2,982).
    • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.0 vs 29.8 PassMark/$ ($227 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
    • 412% higher power demand at 512W vs 100W.
    • No boxed cooler included, unlike Athlon X4 760K.

    Quick Answers

    So, is Athlon X4 760K better than Core i5-4300M?
    Yes. Athlon X4 760K is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 8.2% average FPS lead across 45 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.7% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
    Which one is better for gaming?
    If gaming is the priority, Athlon X4 760K is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 8.2% more average FPS across 45 shared CPU game tests.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon X4 760K is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Athlon X4 760K is the better buy right now. Athlon X4 760K comes in $127 cheaper on MSRP at $100 MSRP versus $227 MSRP, and it still gives you a 8.2% average FPS lead across 45 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 128.7% better value on MSRP (29.8 vs 13.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Athlon X4 760K makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

    Athlon X4 760K vs Core i5-4300M Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    AMD

    Athlon X4 760K

    The Athlon X4 760K is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 100 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 2,982 points. Launch price was $149.

    Intel

    Core i5-4300M

    The Core i5-4300M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA946. Thermal design power (TDP): 37 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,960 points. Launch price was $227.

    Processing Power

    The Athlon X4 760K packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i5-4300M offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Athlon X4 760K has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.1 GHz on the Athlon X4 760K versus 3.3 GHz on the Core i5-4300M — a 21.6% clock advantage for the Athlon X4 760K (base: 3.8 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Athlon X4 760K uses the Richland (2013−2014) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i5-4300M uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon X4 760K scores 2,982 against the Core i5-4300M's 2,960 — a 0.7% lead for the Athlon X4 760K.

    FeatureAthlon X4 760KCore i5-4300M
    Cores / Threads
    4 / 4+100%
    2 / 4
    Boost Clock
    4.1 GHz+24%
    3.3 GHz
    Base Clock
    3.8 GHz+46%
    2.6 GHz
    L3 Cache
    3 MB (total)
    L2 Cache
    4 MB
    256K (per core)+6300%
    Process
    32 nm
    22 nm-31%
    Architecture
    Richland (2013−2014)
    Haswell (2013−2015)
    PassMark
    2,982
    2,960
    Geekbench 6 Single
    495
    Geekbench 6 Multi
    1,404
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    The Athlon X4 760K uses the FM2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-4300M uses PGA946 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

    FeatureAthlon X4 760KCore i5-4300M
    Socket
    FM2
    PGA946
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 3.0
    PCIe 3.0
    Max RAM Speed
    DDR3-1866
    Max RAM Capacity
    32 GB
    RAM Channels
    2
    ECC Support
    No
    PCIe Lanes
    16
    🔧

    Advanced Features

    Virtualization: AMD-V (Athlon X4 760K) / not specified (Core i5-4300M). Primary use case: Athlon X4 760K targets Budget.

    FeatureAthlon X4 760KCore i5-4300M
    Integrated GPU
    No
    Unlocked
    Yes
    AVX-512
    No
    Virtualization
    AMD-V
    Target Use
    Budget
    💰

    Value Analysis

    At launch, the Athlon X4 760K was priced at $100, while the Core i5-4300M came in at $227. On launch pricing ($100 vs $227), Athlon X4 760K was $127 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon X4 760K delivers 29.8 pts/$ vs 13.0 pts/$ for the Core i5-4300M — making the Athlon X4 760K the 78.3% better value option.

    FeatureAthlon X4 760KCore i5-4300M
    MSRP
    $100-56%
    $227
    Performance per Dollar
    29.8+129%
    13.0
    Release Date
    2013
    2013

    Affiliate Disclosure

    ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

    Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.