Core i5-4300U vs Core i7-4650U

Intel

Core i5-4300U

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 2.9 GHz2013
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Core i7-4650U

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 3.3 GHz2013
Similar parts
·······

Core i5-4300U vs Core i7-4650U Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-4300U vs Core i7-4650U FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-4300U vs Core i7-4650U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-4300U

2013

Why buy it

  • +0.8% higher PassMark.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (12 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 4400, while Core i7-4650U needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-4650U across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 4 MB).

Core i7-4650U

2013

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +3.2% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB).

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (2,463 vs 2,482).
  • No integrated graphics, while Core i5-4300U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-4300U better than Core i7-4650U?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i7-4650U is ahead with a 3.2% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-4300U pulls ahead with 0.8% better PassMark. Core i7-4650U also has the bigger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB).
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-4300U is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i5-4300U still makes the most sense overall. Core i5-4300U comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.8% better PassMark.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-4300U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i5-4300U vs Core i7-4650U Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core i5-4300U

The Core i5-4300U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 October 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,482 points. Launch price was $281.

Intel

Core i7-4650U

The Core i7-4650U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell-ULT (2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,463 points. Launch price was $454.

Processing Power

Both the Core i5-4300U and Core i7-4650U share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.9 GHz on the Core i5-4300U versus 3.3 GHz on the Core i7-4650U — a 12.9% clock advantage for the Core i7-4650U (base: 1.9 GHz vs 1.7 GHz). The Core i5-4300U uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Core i7-4650U uses Haswell-ULT (2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-4300U scores 2,482 against the Core i7-4650U's 2,463 — a 0.8% lead for the Core i5-4300U. L3 cache: 3 MB on the Core i5-4300U vs 4 MB (total) on the Core i7-4650U.

FeatureCore i5-4300UCore i7-4650U
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
2 / 4
Boost Clock
2.9 GHz
3.3 GHz+14%
Base Clock
1.9 GHz+12%
1.7 GHz
L3 Cache
3 MB
4 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache
512 kB+100%
256K (per core)
Process
22 nm
22 nm
Architecture
Haswell (2013−2015)
Haswell-ULT (2013)
PassMark
2,482
2,463
Geekbench 6 Single
607
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,722
🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the FCBGA1168 socket with PCIe 3.0.

FeatureCore i5-4300UCore i7-4650U
Socket
FCBGA1168
FCBGA1168
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3L-1600
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
12
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: Yes (Core i5-4300U) / not specified (Core i7-4650U). The Core i5-4300U includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 4400), while the Core i7-4650U requires a dedicated GPU.

FeatureCore i5-4300UCore i7-4650U
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics 4400
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
Yes