A10-9620P vs Core i5-4300U

A10-9620P vs Core i5-4300U Performance Spectrum

A10-9620P

4 / 4

2,514

+1.3%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core i5-4300U

2 / 4

2,482

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A10-9620P vs Core i5-4300U FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A10-9620P vs Core i5-4300U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A10-9620P

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.0% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 2W instead of 512W, a 510W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Core i5-4300U

2013

Why buy it

✅50% more PCIe lanes (12 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than A10-9620P across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (2,482 vs 2,514).
❌25500% higher power demand at 512W vs 2W.

Quick Answers

So, is A10-9620P better than Core i5-4300U?

Yes. A10-9620P is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 6.0% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1.3% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, A10-9620P is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 6.0% more average FPS across 49 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A10-9620P is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.3% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A10-9620P still makes the most sense overall. A10-9620P comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 6.0% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A10-9620P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2013) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A10-9620P vs Core i5-4300U Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A10-9620P

The A10-9620P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,514 points. Launch price was $130.

Core i5-4300U

The Core i5-4300U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 October 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,482 points. Launch price was $281.

⚡

Processing Power

The A10-9620P packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i5-4300U offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the A10-9620P has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the A10-9620P versus 2.9 GHz on the Core i5-4300U — a 15.9% clock advantage for the A10-9620P (base: 2.5 GHz vs 1.9 GHz). The A10-9620P uses the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture (28 nm), while the Core i5-4300U uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the A10-9620P scores 2,514 against the Core i5-4300U's 2,482 — a 1.3% lead for the A10-9620P. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 485 vs 607, a 22.3% lead for the Core i5-4300U that directly translates to higher frame rates.

Feature	A10-9620P	Core i5-4300U
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	3.4 GHz+17%	2.9 GHz
Base Clock	2.5 GHz+32%	1.9 GHz
L3 Cache	—	3 MB
L2 Cache	2 MB+300%	512 kB
Process	28 nm	22 nm-21%
Architecture	Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)	Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark	2,514+1%	2,482
Geekbench 6 Single	485	607+25%
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	1,722

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10-9620P uses the FP4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-4300U uses FCBGA1168 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-1866 on the A10-9620P versus DDR3L-1600 on the Core i5-4300U — the A10-9620P supports 16.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A10-9620P supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 8 (A10-9620P) vs 12 (Core i5-4300U) — the Core i5-4300U offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	A10-9620P	Core i5-4300U
Socket	FP4	FCBGA1168
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-1866+17%	DDR3L-1600
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB+300%	16 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	8	12+50%

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: AMD-V (A10-9620P) vs Yes (Core i5-4300U). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon R5 (A10-9620P) and Intel HD Graphics 4400 (Core i5-4300U) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10-9620P targets Laptop. Direct competitor: A10-9620P rivals Core i3-7100U.