Core i5-4400E
VS
Core i5-L16G7

Core i5-4400E vs Core i5-L16G7

Intel

Core i5-4400E

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 3.3 GHz2013
VS
Intel

Core i5-L16G7

5 Cores5 Thrd7 WWMax: 3 GHz2020

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i5-4400E is positioned at rank 1032 and the Core i5-L16G7 is on rank 1040, so the Core i5-4400E offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-4400E

#1020
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
2401%
#1021
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
2366%
#1022
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2172%
#1023
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
2162%
#1024
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
2142%
#1026
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2069%
#1027
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1984%
#1028
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1980%
#1029
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1927%
#1032
Core i5-4400E
MSRP: $266|Avg: $50
100%
#1034
Pentium Dual Core T4400
MSRP: $107|Avg: $5
98%
#1037
Core i7-8665UE
MSRP: $409|Avg: $409
97%
#1038
Celeron T3300
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
96%
#1039
Celeron Dual-Core T3300
MSRP: $86|Avg: $30
96%
#1042
Core i7-3612QE
MSRP: $426|Avg: $50
95%
#1043
A10-7300
MSRP: $150|Avg: $50
95%
#1044
Pentium Dual Core T4200
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
94%
#1045
A6 Micro-6500T
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
94%
#1046
Pentium N3520
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
94%
#1047
E2-3800
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-L16G7

#1028
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
2514%
#1029
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
2477%
#1030
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2274%
#1031
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
2264%
#1032
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
2243%
#1034
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2166%
#1035
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2077%
#1036
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2074%
#1037
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
2018%
#1040
Core i5-L16G7
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#1042
Core i7-3612QE
MSRP: $426|Avg: $50
99%
#1043
A10-7300
MSRP: $150|Avg: $50
99%
#1044
Pentium Dual Core T4200
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
98%
#1045
A6 Micro-6500T
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
98%
#1046
Pentium N3520
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
98%
#1047
E2-3800
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
97%
#1048
Athlon X2 QL-66
MSRP: $150|Avg: $5
97%
#1049
Athlon II Neo K145
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
97%
#1050
Celeron P4600
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
96%
#1051
Core 2 Duo U7500
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
96%
#1052
Pentium 987
MSRP: $134|Avg: $20
95%
#1053
Core i7-4910MQ
MSRP: $570|Avg: $570
95%
#1054
Pentium T4400
MSRP: $107|Avg: $5
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Core i5-L16G7 (2020) utilizes 10 nm technology and LPDDR4X-4267, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCore i5-4400ECore i5-L16G7
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($50)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm)
✨ Modern (Lakefield (2020) / 10 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i5-4400E (2013) relies on 22 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCore i5-4400ECore i5-L16G7
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($50)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-4400E and Core i5-L16G7

Intel

Core i5-4400E

The Core i5-4400E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 October 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1364. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB + 3 MB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,251 points. Launch price was $266.

Intel

Core i5-L16G7

The Core i5-L16G7 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Junho 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Lakefield (2020) architecture. It features 5 cores and 5 threads. Base frequency is 1.4 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FC-CSP1016. Thermal design power (TDP): 7 Watt. Memory support: LPDDR4X-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 3,280 points. Launch price was $281.

Processing Power

The Core i5-4400E packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i5-L16G7 offers 5 cores / 5 threads — the Core i5-L16G7 has 3 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the Core i5-4400E versus 3 GHz on the Core i5-L16G7 — a 9.5% clock advantage for the Core i5-4400E (base: 2.7 GHz vs 1.4 GHz). The Core i5-4400E uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Core i5-L16G7 uses Lakefield (2020) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-4400E scores 3,251 against the Core i5-L16G7's 3,280 — a 0.9% lead for the Core i5-L16G7. L3 cache: 3 MB on the Core i5-4400E vs 4 MB (total) on the Core i5-L16G7.

FeatureCore i5-4400ECore i5-L16G7
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
5 / 5+150%
Boost Clock
3.3 GHz+10%
3 GHz
Base Clock
2.7 GHz+93%
1.4 GHz
L3 Cache
3 MB
4 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache
512 kB
512 kB
Process
22 nm
10 nm-55%
Architecture
Haswell (2013−2015)
Lakefield (2020)
PassMark
3,251
3,280
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-4400E uses the BGA1364 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-L16G7 uses FC-CSP1016 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3L-1600 on the Core i5-4400E versus LPDDR4x-4267 on the Core i5-L16G7 — the Core i5-L16G7 supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-4400E supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i5-4400E) vs 9 (Core i5-L16G7) — the Core i5-4400E offers 7 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

FeatureCore i5-4400ECore i5-L16G7
Socket
BGA1364
FC-CSP1016
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3L-1600
LPDDR4x-4267+33%
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB+100%
8 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16+78%
9
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Both include integrated graphics HD Graphics 4600 (Core i5-4400E) and UHD Graphics (Core i5-L16G7) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-4400E targets Embedded, Core i5-L16G7 targets Mobile.

FeatureCore i5-4400ECore i5-L16G7
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 4600
UHD Graphics
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Embedded
Mobile