Core i5-4400E vs Xeon W3570

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-4400E vs Xeon W3570 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-4400E vs Xeon W3570: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-4400E

2013

Why buy it

✅Costs $733 less on MSRP ($266 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 273.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 12.2 vs 3.3 PassMark/$ ($266 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 4600, while Xeon W3570 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W3570 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (3,251 vs 3,267).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 8 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W3570, which brings 4 cores / 8 threads.
❌293.8% higher power demand at 512W vs 130W.

Xeon W3570

2009

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +12.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+166.7% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 3 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 8 threads.
✅Draws 130W instead of 512W, a 382W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 3.3 vs 12.2 PassMark/$ ($999 MSRP vs $266 MSRP).
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-4400E can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon W3570 better than Core i5-4400E?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon W3570 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-4400E is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon W3570 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 12.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon W3570 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 166.7% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 3 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon W3570 is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. Xeon W3570 comes in 275.6% more expensive on MSRP at $999 MSRP versus $266 MSRP, and it still gives you a 12.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-4400E only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games, especially when the gap is already 12.9% in the shared gaming data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-4400E makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2009). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i5-4400E vs Xeon W3570 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-4400E

The Core i5-4400E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 October 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1364. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB + 3 MB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,251 points. Launch price was $266.

Xeon W3570

The Xeon W3570 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 March 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Bloomfield (2008−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.46 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,267 points. Launch price was $480.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-4400E packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Xeon W3570 offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Xeon W3570 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the Core i5-4400E versus 3.46 GHz on the Xeon W3570 — a 4.7% clock advantage for the Xeon W3570 (base: 2.7 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core i5-4400E uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon W3570 uses Bloomfield (2008−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-4400E scores 3,251 against the Xeon W3570's 3,267 — a 0.5% lead for the Xeon W3570. L3 cache: 3 MB on the Core i5-4400E vs 8 MB (total) on the Xeon W3570.

Feature	Core i5-4400E	Xeon W3570
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	4 / 8+100%
Boost Clock	3.3 GHz	3.46 GHz+5%
Base Clock	2.7 GHz	3.2 GHz+19%
L3 Cache	3 MB	8 MB (total)+167%
L2 Cache	512 kB+100%	256 kB (per core)
Process	22 nm-51%	45 nm
Architecture	Haswell (2013−2015)	Bloomfield (2008−2010)
PassMark	3,251	3,267

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-4400E uses the BGA1364 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon W3570 uses LGA1366 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i5-4400E	Xeon W3570
Socket	BGA1364	LGA1366
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3L-1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-4400E) / not specified (Xeon W3570). The Core i5-4400E includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4600), while the Xeon W3570 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-4400E targets Embedded.

Feature	Core i5-4400E	Xeon W3570
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	HD Graphics 4600	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	—
Target Use	Embedded	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i5-4400E was priced at $266, while the Xeon W3570 came in at $999. On launch pricing ($266 vs $999), Core i5-4400E was $733 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-4400E delivers 12.2 pts/$ vs 3.3 pts/$ for the Xeon W3570 — making the Core i5-4400E the 115.6% better value option.

Feature	Core i5-4400E	Xeon W3570
MSRP	$266-73%	$999
Performance per Dollar	12.2+270%	3.3
Release Date	2013	2009

Search Core i5-4400E on Amazon

Search Xeon W3570 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.