PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-4360T vs Core i5-4400E FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-4360T vs Core i5-4400E: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-4360T

2014

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB).
✅Costs $128 less on MSRP ($138 MSRP vs $266 MSRP).
✅Delivers 95.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 23.9 vs 12.2 PassMark/$ ($138 MSRP vs $266 MSRP).
✅Draws 35W instead of 512W, a 477W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Core i5-4400E

2013

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i3-4360T across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (3,251 vs 3,294).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 4 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.2 vs 23.9 PassMark/$ ($266 MSRP vs $138 MSRP).
❌1362.9% higher power demand at 512W vs 35W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-4360T better than Core i5-4400E?

Yes. Core i3-4360T is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 6.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1.3% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i3-4360T is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 6.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-4360T is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.3% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-4360T is the better buy right now. Core i3-4360T comes in $128 cheaper on MSRP at $138 MSRP versus $266 MSRP, and it still gives you a 6.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 95.3% better value on MSRP (23.9 vs 12.2 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-4360T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2013), 33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i3-4360T vs Core i5-4400E Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-4360T

The Core i3-4360T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 21 July 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,294 points. Launch price was $69.

Core i5-4400E

The Core i5-4400E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 October 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1364. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB + 3 MB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,251 points. Launch price was $266.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i3-4360T and Core i5-4400E share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Core i3-4360T versus 3.3 GHz on the Core i5-4400E — a 3.1% clock advantage for the Core i5-4400E (base: 3.2 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). Both are built on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture using a 22 nm process. In PassMark, the Core i3-4360T scores 3,294 against the Core i5-4400E's 3,251 — a 1.3% lead for the Core i3-4360T. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Core i3-4360T vs 3 MB on the Core i5-4400E.

Feature	Core i3-4360T	Core i5-4400E
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	2 / 4
Boost Clock	3.2 GHz	3.3 GHz+3%
Base Clock	3.2 GHz+19%	2.7 GHz
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)+33%	3 MB
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	512 kB+100%
Process	22 nm	22 nm
Architecture	Haswell (2013−2015)	Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark	3,294+1%	3,251

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-4360T uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-4400E uses BGA1364 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1600 memory speed. The Core i3-4360T supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes.

Feature	Core i3-4360T	Core i5-4400E
Socket	LGA1150	BGA1364
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600	DDR3L-1600
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB+100%	16 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Both include integrated graphics — HD Graphics 4600 (Core i3-4360T) and HD Graphics 4600 (Core i5-4400E) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-4360T targets Desktop, Core i5-4400E targets Embedded.

Feature	Core i3-4360T	Core i5-4400E
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	HD Graphics 4600	HD Graphics 4600
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	Desktop	Embedded

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i3-4360T was priced at $138, while the Core i5-4400E came in at $266. On launch pricing ($138 vs $266), Core i3-4360T was $128 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-4360T delivers 23.9 pts/$ vs 12.2 pts/$ for the Core i5-4400E — making the Core i3-4360T the 64.5% better value option.

Feature	Core i3-4360T	Core i5-4400E
MSRP	$138-48%	$266
Performance per Dollar	23.9+96%	12.2
Release Date	2014	2013

Search Core i3-4360T on Amazon

Search Core i5-4400E on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.