Core i5-4400E vs PRO A8-8650B

Core i5-4400E vs PRO A8-8650B Performance Spectrum

Core i5-4400E

2 / 4

3,251

+0.7%

3,230

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-4400E vs PRO A8-8650B FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-4400E vs PRO A8-8650B: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-4400E

2013

Why buy it

✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 4600, while PRO A8-8650B needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than PRO A8-8650B across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Launch MSRP is still $266 MSRP, while PRO A8-8650B mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌687.7% higher power demand at 512W vs 65W.

PRO A8-8650B

2015

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +8.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 65W instead of 512W, a 447W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (3,230 vs 3,251).
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-4400E can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is PRO A8-8650B better than Core i5-4400E?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, PRO A8-8650B is ahead with a 8.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-4400E pulls ahead with 0.7% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-4400E is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

PRO A8-8650B is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. PRO A8-8650B comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $266 MSRP, and it still gives you a 8.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-4400E only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games, especially when the gap is already 8.5% in the shared gaming data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

PRO A8-8650B makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2013). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i5-4400E vs PRO A8-8650B Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-4400E

The Core i5-4400E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 October 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1364. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB + 3 MB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,251 points. Launch price was $266.

PRO A8-8650B

The PRO A8-8650B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Godaveri (2014−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 3,230 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-4400E packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the PRO A8-8650B offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the PRO A8-8650B has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the Core i5-4400E versus 3.9 GHz on the PRO A8-8650B — a 16.7% clock advantage for the PRO A8-8650B (base: 2.7 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core i5-4400E uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the PRO A8-8650B uses Godaveri (2014−2016) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-4400E scores 3,251 against the PRO A8-8650B's 3,230 — a 0.6% lead for the Core i5-4400E.

Feature	Core i5-4400E	PRO A8-8650B
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	3.3 GHz	3.9 GHz+18%
Base Clock	2.7 GHz	3.2 GHz+19%
L3 Cache	3 MB	—
L2 Cache	512 kB	4096 kB+700%
Process	22 nm-21%	28 nm
Architecture	Haswell (2013−2015)	Godaveri (2014−2016)
PassMark	3,251	3,230

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-4400E uses the BGA1364 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the PRO A8-8650B uses FM2+ (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i5-4400E	PRO A8-8650B
Socket	BGA1364	FM2+
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3L-1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-4400E) / not specified (PRO A8-8650B). The Core i5-4400E includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4600), while the PRO A8-8650B requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-4400E targets Embedded.