
Core i5-4670K vs Core i5-13400F

Core i5-4670K

Core i5-13400F
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The Core i5-4670K is positioned at rank #865 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core i5-4670K
Performance Per Dollar Core i5-13400F
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core i5-4670K | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($200) | ✅ More affordable ($180) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm) | ✨ Modern (Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) / Intel 7 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core i5-4670K | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+398%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($200) | ✅ More affordable ($180) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-4670K and Core i5-13400F

Core i5-4670K
The Core i5-4670K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 6144 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 84 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,584 points. Launch price was $266.

Core i5-13400F
The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.
Processing Power
The Core i5-4670K packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i5-13400F offers 10 cores / 16 threads — the Core i5-13400F has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Core i5-4670K versus 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F — a 19% clock advantage for the Core i5-13400F (base: 3.4 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core i5-4670K uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Core i5-13400F uses Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-4670K scores 5,584 against the Core i5-13400F's 25,029 — a 127% lead for the Core i5-13400F. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 975 vs 2,407, a 84.7% lead for the Core i5-13400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 6144 kB (total) on the Core i5-4670K vs 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F.
| Feature | Core i5-4670K | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 10 / 16+150% |
| Boost Clock | 3.8 GHz | 4.6 GHz+21% |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz+36% | 2.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 6144 kB (total) | 20 MB (total)+233% |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core)+400% |
| Process | 22 nm | Intel 7 nm-68% |
| Architecture | Haswell (2013−2015) | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 5,584 | 25,029+348% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 16,211 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 975 | 2,407+147% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 11,408 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-4670K uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-13400F uses LGA1700 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the Core i5-4670K versus DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-13400F — the Core i5-13400F supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-13400F supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 142.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i5-4670K) vs 20 (Core i5-13400F) — the Core i5-13400F offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Z87,Z97 (Core i5-4670K) and H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-13400F).
| Feature | Core i5-4670K | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1150 | LGA1700 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 5.0+67% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1600 | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200+67% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | 192 GB+500% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 20+25% |
Advanced Features
Only the Core i5-4670K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, EPT (Core i5-4670K) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F). The Core i5-4670K includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4600), while the Core i5-13400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-4670K targets Gaming Desktop, Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-4670K rivals FX-9370; Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.
| Feature | Core i5-4670K | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics 4600 | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, EPT | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Gaming Desktop | Gaming |
Value Analysis
The Core i5-4670K launched at $328 MSRP, while the Core i5-13400F debuted at $196. At current prices ($200 vs $180), the Core i5-13400F is $20 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-4670K delivers 27.9 pts/$ vs 139.1 pts/$ for the Core i5-13400F — making the Core i5-13400F the 133.1% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-4670K | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $328 | $196-40% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $200 | $180-10% |
| Performance per Dollar | 27.9 | 139.1+399% |
| Release Date | 2013 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















