
Core i5-4670K

Core i7-3615QE
Core i5-4670K vs Core i7-3615QE Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-4670K vs Core i7-3615QE FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-4670K vs Core i7-3615QE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-4670K
2013Why buy it
- ✅Costs $72 less on MSRP ($328 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 21.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 17.0 vs 14.0 PassMark/$ ($328 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 4600, while Core i7-3615QE needs a discrete GPU.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i7-3615QE.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-3615QE across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (5,584 vs 5,617).
- ❌86.7% higher power demand at 84W vs 45W.
Core i7-3615QE
2012Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 84W, a 39W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 14.0 vs 17.0 PassMark/$ ($400 MSRP vs $328 MSRP).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-4670K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-4670K.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-3615QE better than Core i5-4670K?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-4670K vs Core i7-3615QE Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-4670K
The Core i5-4670K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 6144 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 84 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,584 points. Launch price was $266.

Core i7-3615QE
The Core i7-3615QE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 April 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 6144 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: unknown Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 5,617 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Core i5-4670K packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Core i7-3615QE's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Core i5-4670K versus 3.3 GHz on the Core i7-3615QE — a 14.1% clock advantage for the Core i5-4670K (base: 3.4 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Core i5-4670K uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Core i7-3615QE uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-4670K scores 5,584 against the Core i7-3615QE's 5,617 — a 0.6% lead for the Core i7-3615QE. Both processors carry 6144 kB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | Core i5-4670K | Core i7-3615QE |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 3.8 GHz+15% | 3.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz+48% | 2.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 6144 kB (total) | 6144 kB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 22 nm | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Haswell (2013−2015) | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) |
| PassMark | 5,584 | 5,617 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 975 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-4670K uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-3615QE uses BGA1023 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-4670K | Core i7-3615QE |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1150 | BGA1023 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1600 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, EPT (Core i5-4670K) / not specified (Core i7-3615QE). The Core i5-4670K includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4600), while the Core i7-3615QE requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-4670K targets Gaming Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i5-4670K rivals FX-9370.
| Feature | Core i5-4670K | Core i7-3615QE |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics 4600 | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, EPT | — |
| Target Use | Gaming Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i5-4670K was priced at $328, while the Core i7-3615QE came in at $400. On launch pricing ($328 vs $400), Core i5-4670K was $72 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-4670K delivers 17.0 pts/$ vs 14.0 pts/$ for the Core i7-3615QE — making the Core i5-4670K the 19.2% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-4670K | Core i7-3615QE |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $328-18% | $400 |
| Performance per Dollar | 17.0+21% | 14.0 |
| Release Date | 2013 | 2012 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















