Core i5-4670K
VS
Xeon E3-1280

Core i5-4670K vs Xeon E3-1280

Intel

Core i5-4670K

4 Cores4 Thrd84 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2013
VS
Intel

Xeon E3-1280

4 Cores8 Thrd95 WWMax: 3.9 GHz2011

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i5-4670K is positioned at rank 865 and the Xeon E3-1280 is on rank 517, so the Xeon E3-1280 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-4670K

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
18315%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
17306%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
12565%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
3785%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2998%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
2623%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1502%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1483%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1350%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1350%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1335%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1299%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1281%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1275%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1264%
#298
Core i9-7960X
MSRP: $1699|Avg: $185
97%
#865
Core i5-4670K
MSRP: $328|Avg: $200
100%
#866
Core i5-3330S
MSRP: $231|Avg: $30
100%
#867
Celeron G465
MSRP: $70|Avg: $37
99%
#868
Athlon II X4 630
MSRP: $129|Avg: $15
99%
#869
A6-7400K
MSRP: $101|Avg: $43
98%
#870
Core i7-4765T
MSRP: $303|Avg: $50
97%
#871
Core i7-4770TE
MSRP: $303|Avg: $303
97%
#872
Core i5-4570T
MSRP: $195|Avg: $45
97%
#873
Athlon II X2 260u
MSRP: $60|Avg: $10
97%
#875
A4-3420
MSRP: $65|Avg: $30
96%
#876
Core i5-5675R
MSRP: $339|Avg: $392
96%
#877
Pentium G3470
MSRP: $150|Avg: $130
96%
#878
Core i5-3335S
MSRP: $225|Avg: $30
96%
#879
Core i5-3470T
MSRP: $184|Avg: $35
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E3-1280

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
7406%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
1398%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
1242%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
960%
#318
EPYC 7343
MSRP: $1565|Avg: $1350
99%
#319
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
MSRP: $2399|Avg: $225
99%
#320
EPYC 7413
MSRP: $1825|Avg: $450
99%
#321
Xeon W-3335
MSRP: $1430|Avg: $1200
98%
#322
EPYC 9354P
MSRP: $2730|Avg: $2205
98%
#323
EPYC 9224
MSRP: $1825|Avg: $1199
95%
#324
Xeon Gold 6423N
MSRP: $2161|Avg: $2161
95%
#325
Xeon w7-3565X
MSRP: $2689|Avg: $2850
94%
#517
Xeon E3-1280
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($0) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon E3-1280 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightCore i5-4670KXeon E3-1280
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($200)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i5-4670K ($200), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($200 less, Infinity% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightCore i5-4670KXeon E3-1280
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($200)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-4670K and Xeon E3-1280

Intel

Core i5-4670K

The Core i5-4670K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 6144 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 84 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,584 points. Launch price was $266.

Intel

Xeon E3-1280

The Xeon E3-1280 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 April 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,612 points. Launch price was $450.

Processing Power

The Core i5-4670K packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Xeon E3-1280's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Core i5-4670K versus 3.9 GHz on the Xeon E3-1280 — a 2.6% clock advantage for the Xeon E3-1280 (base: 3.4 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Core i5-4670K uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon E3-1280 uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-4670K scores 5,584 against the Xeon E3-1280's 5,612 — a 0.5% lead for the Xeon E3-1280. L3 cache: 6144 kB (total) on the Core i5-4670K vs 8 MB (total) on the Xeon E3-1280.

FeatureCore i5-4670KXeon E3-1280
Cores / Threads
4 / 4
4 / 8
Boost Clock
3.8 GHz
3.9 GHz+3%
Base Clock
3.4 GHz
3.5 GHz+3%
L3 Cache
6144 kB (total)
8 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
256 kB (per core)
Process
22 nm-31%
32 nm
Architecture
Haswell (2013−2015)
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark
5,584
5,612
Geekbench 6 Single
975
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-4670K uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E3-1280 uses LGA1155 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i5-4670KXeon E3-1280
Socket
LGA1150
LGA1155
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, EPT (Core i5-4670K) / not specified (Xeon E3-1280). The Core i5-4670K includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4600), while the Xeon E3-1280 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-4670K targets Gaming Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i5-4670K rivals FX-9370.

FeatureCore i5-4670KXeon E3-1280
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 4600
Unlocked
Yes
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, EPT
Target Use
Gaming Desktop