
Core i5-4670K

Opteron 6366 HE
Core i5-4670K vs Opteron 6366 HE Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-4670K vs Opteron 6366 HE FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-4670K vs Opteron 6366 HE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-4670K
2013Why buy it
- β Draws 84W instead of 85W, a 1W reduction.
- β 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- β Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 4600, while Opteron 6366 HE needs a discrete GPU.
- β Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Opteron 6366 HE.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Opteron 6366 HE across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (5,584 vs 5,613).
- βSmaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
- βLess compelling for workstation-style loads than Opteron 6366 HE, which brings 16 cores / 16 threads.
- βLaunch MSRP is still $328 MSRP, while Opteron 6366 HE mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Opteron 6366 HE
2012Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +12.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β +33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
- β Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 16 threads.
Trade-offs
- βNo integrated graphics, while Core i5-4670K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- βNo boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-4670K.
Quick Answers
So, is Opteron 6366 HE better than Core i5-4670K?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-4670K vs Opteron 6366 HE Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-4670K
The Core i5-4670K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013β2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 6144 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 84 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,584 points. Launch price was $266.

Opteron 6366 HE
The Opteron 6366 HE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Abu Dhabi (2012) architecture. It features 16 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 16 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: G34. Thermal design power (TDP): 85 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,613 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Core i5-4670K packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Opteron 6366 HE offers 16 cores / 16 threads β the Opteron 6366 HE has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Core i5-4670K versus 3.1 GHz on the Opteron 6366 HE β a 20.3% clock advantage for the Core i5-4670K (base: 3.4 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The Core i5-4670K uses the Haswell (2013β2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Opteron 6366 HE uses Abu Dhabi (2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-4670K scores 5,584 against the Opteron 6366 HE's 5,613 β a 0.5% lead for the Opteron 6366 HE. L3 cache: 6144 kB (total) on the Core i5-4670K vs 8 MB (total) on the Opteron 6366 HE.
| Feature | Core i5-4670K | Opteron 6366 HE |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 16 / 16+300% |
| Boost Clock | 3.8 GHz+23% | 3.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz+89% | 1.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 6144 kB (total) | 8 MB (total)+33% |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 16 MB+6300% |
| Process | 22 nm-31% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Haswell (2013β2015) | Abu Dhabi (2012) |
| PassMark | 5,584 | 5,613 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 975 | β |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-4670K uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Opteron 6366 HE uses G34 (PCIe 2.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-4670K | Opteron 6366 HE |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1150 | G34 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1600 | β |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | β |
| RAM Channels | 2 | β |
| ECC Support | No | β |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | β |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, EPT (Core i5-4670K) / not specified (Opteron 6366 HE). The Core i5-4670K includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4600), while the Opteron 6366 HE requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-4670K targets Gaming Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i5-4670K rivals FX-9370.
| Feature | Core i5-4670K | Opteron 6366 HE |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | β |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics 4600 | β |
| Unlocked | Yes | β |
| AVX-512 | No | β |
| Virtualization | VT-x, EPT | β |
| Target Use | Gaming Desktop | β |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















