Core i5-4670K vs Ryzen 3 PRO 1200

CPU

GPU

Core i5-4670K

4 Cores4 Thrd84 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2013

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Ryzen 3 PRO 1200

4 Cores4 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2017

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Core i5-4670K vs Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 Performance Spectrum

Core i5-4670K

4 / 4

5,584

0.0%

5,609

+0.4%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-4670K vs Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-4670K vs Ryzen 3 PRO 1200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-4670K

2013

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 4600, while Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 3 PRO 1200.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (5,584 vs 5,609).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 17.0 vs 51.5 PassMark/$ ($328 MSRP vs $109 MSRP).
❌29.2% higher power demand at 84W vs 65W.

Ryzen 3 PRO 1200

2017

Why buy it

✅+0.4% higher PassMark.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
✅Costs $219 less on MSRP ($109 MSRP vs $328 MSRP).
✅Delivers 202.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 51.5 vs 17.0 PassMark/$ ($109 MSRP vs $328 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 84W, a 19W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-4670K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-4670K.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 better than Core i5-4670K?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i5-4670K is ahead with a 2.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 pulls ahead with 0.4% better PassMark. Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 also has the bigger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 is the better buy right now. Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 comes in $219 cheaper on MSRP at $109 MSRP versus $328 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.4% better PassMark. The compromise is that Core i5-4670K is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 2.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 202.3% better value on MSRP (51.5 vs 17.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2013), 33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i5-4670K vs Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-4670K

The Core i5-4670K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 6144 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 84 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,584 points. Launch price was $266.

Ryzen 3 PRO 1200

The Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 5,609 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i5-4670K and Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Core i5-4670K versus 3.4 GHz on the Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 — a 11.1% clock advantage for the Core i5-4670K (base: 3.4 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The Core i5-4670K uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 uses Zen (2017−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-4670K scores 5,584 against the Ryzen 3 PRO 1200's 5,609 — a 0.4% lead for the Ryzen 3 PRO 1200. L3 cache: 6144 kB (total) on the Core i5-4670K vs 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 PRO 1200.

Feature	Core i5-4670K	Ryzen 3 PRO 1200
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 4
Boost Clock	3.8 GHz+12%	3.4 GHz
Base Clock	3.4 GHz+10%	3.1 GHz
L3 Cache	6144 kB (total)	8 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	512K (per core)+100%
Process	22 nm	14 nm-36%
Architecture	Haswell (2013−2015)	Zen (2017−2020)
PassMark	5,584	5,609
Geekbench 6 Single	975	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-4670K uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i5-4670K	Ryzen 3 PRO 1200
Socket	LGA1150	AM4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, EPT (Core i5-4670K) / not specified (Ryzen 3 PRO 1200). The Core i5-4670K includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4600), while the Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-4670K targets Gaming Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i5-4670K rivals FX-9370.

Feature	Core i5-4670K	Ryzen 3 PRO 1200
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	HD Graphics 4600	—
Unlocked	Yes	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x, EPT	—
Target Use	Gaming Desktop	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i5-4670K was priced at $328, while the Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 came in at $109. On launch pricing ($328 vs $109), Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 was $219 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-4670K delivers 17.0 pts/$ vs 51.5 pts/$ for the Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 — making the Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 the 100.6% better value option.

Feature	Core i5-4670K	Ryzen 3 PRO 1200
MSRP	$328	$109-67%
Performance per Dollar	17.0	51.5+203%
Release Date	2013	2017

Search Core i5-4670K on Amazon

Search Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.