Core i5-540UM
VS
Athlon II X2 240e

Core i5-540UM vs Athlon II X2 240e

Intel

Core i5-540UM

2 Cores4 Thrd18 WWMax: 2 GHz2010
VS
AMD

Athlon II X2 240e

2 Cores2 Thrd45 WWMax: 2.8 GHz2009

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i5-540UM is positioned at rank 1081 and the Athlon II X2 240e is on rank 941, so the Athlon II X2 240e offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-540UM

#1068
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
2928%
#1069
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
2885%
#1070
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2649%
#1071
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
2637%
#1072
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
2613%
#1074
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2523%
#1075
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2419%
#1076
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2415%
#1077
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
2350%
#1080
A6-7000
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
100%
#1081
Core i5-540UM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#1082
Core i5-2520M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
99%
#1083
Core i7-2710QE
MSRP: $378|Avg: $40
99%
#1088
Core i5-3610ME
MSRP: $276|Avg: $22
96%
#1089
Core m3-7Y32
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
96%
#1091
Celeron B720
MSRP: $70|Avg: $10
95%
#1092
Celeron 847
MSRP: $134|Avg: $15
95%
#1093
Core i7-2630QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
94%
#1095
Core i7-2635QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon II X2 240e

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
23831%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
22518%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
16350%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
4926%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
3902%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
3413%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1955%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1929%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1757%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1757%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1737%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1690%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1666%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1660%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1645%
#941
Athlon II X2 240e
MSRP: $77|Avg: $77
100%
#942
Pentium G630T
MSRP: $79|Avg: $15
100%
#944
Core i7-3970X Extreme Edition
MSRP: $990|Avg: $175
100%
#946
Core i5-650
MSRP: $176|Avg: $22
98%
#947
Phenom X3 8600
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
97%
#948
A10-6790B
MSRP: $122|Avg: $50
97%
#949
Core i3-6100TE
MSRP: $250|Avg: $90
96%
#950
FX-4320
MSRP: $250|Avg: $100
96%
#951
Core i7-3960X Extreme Edition
MSRP: $990|Avg: $150
96%
#952
Celeron E1200
MSRP: $53|Avg: $98
96%
#954
Core i5-660
MSRP: $196|Avg: $150
95%
#955
Athlon II X2 250
MSRP: $87|Avg: $15
95%
#956
Core i3-2120T
MSRP: $127|Avg: $38
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Athlon II X2 240e delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Core i5-540UM in both compute-intensive tasks (0.5% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightCore i5-540UMAthlon II X2 240e
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($77)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Arrandale (2010−2011) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Regor (2009−2013) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore i5-540UMAthlon II X2 240e
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($77)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-540UM and Athlon II X2 240e

Intel

Core i5-540UM

The Core i5-540UM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 May 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1288. Thermal design power (TDP): 18 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,002 points. Launch price was $250.

AMD

Athlon II X2 240e

The Athlon II X2 240e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 20 October 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Regor (2009−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,007 points. Launch price was $35.

Processing Power

The Core i5-540UM packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Athlon II X2 240e's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Core i5-540UM versus 2.8 GHz on the Athlon II X2 240e — a 33.3% clock advantage for the Athlon II X2 240e (base: 1.2 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Core i5-540UM uses the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture (32 nm), while the Athlon II X2 240e uses Regor (2009−2013) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-540UM scores 1,002 against the Athlon II X2 240e's 1,007 — a 0.5% lead for the Athlon II X2 240e. L3 cache: 3 MB on the Core i5-540UM vs 0 kB on the Athlon II X2 240e.

FeatureCore i5-540UMAthlon II X2 240e
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2 GHz
2.8 GHz+40%
Base Clock
1.2 GHz
2.8 GHz+133%
L3 Cache
3 MB
0 kB
L2 Cache
512 kB
1 MB+100%
Process
32 nm-29%
45 nm
Architecture
Arrandale (2010−2011)
Regor (2009−2013)
PassMark
1,002
1,007
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-540UM uses the BGA1288 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Athlon II X2 240e uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 800 on the Core i5-540UM versus 1333 on the Athlon II X2 240e — the Athlon II X2 240e supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Athlon II X2 240e supports up to 16 of RAM compared to 8 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i5-540UM) vs 0 (Athlon II X2 240e) — the Core i5-540UM offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: HM55,HM57,QM57,QS57 (Core i5-540UM) and AM2+,AM3 (Athlon II X2 240e).

FeatureCore i5-540UMAthlon II X2 240e
Socket
BGA1288
AM3
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
800
1333+67%
Max RAM Capacity
8
16+100%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support true virtualization. The Core i5-540UM includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Ironlake)), while the Athlon II X2 240e requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i5-540UM rivals Core 2 Duo SU9400; Athlon II X2 240e rivals Pentium E5400.

FeatureCore i5-540UMAthlon II X2 240e
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics (Ironlake)
None
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
true
true