Core i5-540UM
VS
Core 2 Duo E4300

Core i5-540UM vs Core 2 Duo E4300

Intel

Core i5-540UM

2 Cores4 Thrd18 WWMax: 2 GHz2010
VS
Intel

Core 2 Duo E4300

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 1.8 GHz2006

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i5-540UM is positioned at rank 1081 and the Core 2 Duo E4300 is on rank 1015, so the Core 2 Duo E4300 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-540UM

#1068
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
2928%
#1069
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
2885%
#1070
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2649%
#1071
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
2637%
#1072
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
2613%
#1074
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2523%
#1075
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2419%
#1076
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2415%
#1077
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
2350%
#1080
A6-7000
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
100%
#1081
Core i5-540UM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#1082
Core i5-2520M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
99%
#1083
Core i7-2710QE
MSRP: $378|Avg: $40
99%
#1088
Core i5-3610ME
MSRP: $276|Avg: $22
96%
#1089
Core m3-7Y32
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
96%
#1091
Celeron B720
MSRP: $70|Avg: $10
95%
#1092
Celeron 847
MSRP: $134|Avg: $15
95%
#1093
Core i7-2630QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
94%
#1095
Core i7-2635QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo E4300

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
35064%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
33132%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
24056%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
7247%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
5740%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
5022%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
2876%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
2839%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
2585%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
2584%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
2556%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
2487%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
2452%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
2442%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
2420%
#1015
Core 2 Duo E4300
MSRP: $113|Avg: $5
100%
#1017
Core 2 Duo E4500
MSRP: $133|Avg: $10
99%
#1019
Core 2 Duo E7600
MSRP: $133|Avg: $50
97%
#1020
Core i7-3970X
MSRP: $990|Avg: $60
97%
#1021
Core 2 Duo E8700
MSRP: $256|Avg: $30
97%
#1022
Core 2 Duo E6550
MSRP: $163|Avg: $20
96%
#1023
Phenom X3 8450
MSRP: $145|Avg: $147
95%
#1024
Core i7-3960X
MSRP: $999|Avg: $60
95%
#1025
Celeron 2.70
MSRP: $49|Avg: $49
94%
#1027
A10 PRO-7850B
MSRP: $426|Avg: $140
91%
#1028
Core 2 Quad Q8200
MSRP: $224|Avg: $36
91%
#1029
A12-9800E
MSRP: $426|Avg: $150
90%
#1030
Phenom II X6 1065T
MSRP: $426|Avg: $170
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Core i5-540UM leads in gaming performance. However, the Core 2 Duo E4300 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.3% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCore i5-540UMCore 2 Duo E4300
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($5)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Arrandale (2010−2011) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Allendale (2006−2009) / 65 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore i5-540UMCore 2 Duo E4300
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($5)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-540UM and Core 2 Duo E4300

Intel

Core i5-540UM

The Core i5-540UM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 May 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1288. Thermal design power (TDP): 18 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,002 points. Launch price was $250.

Intel

Core 2 Duo E4300

The Core 2 Duo E4300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Allendale (2006−2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,005 points. Launch price was $249.

Processing Power

The Core i5-540UM packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Core 2 Duo E4300's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Core i5-540UM versus 1.8 GHz on the Core 2 Duo E4300 — a 10.5% clock advantage for the Core i5-540UM (base: 1.2 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The Core i5-540UM uses the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture (32 nm), while the Core 2 Duo E4300 uses Allendale (2006−2009) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-540UM scores 1,002 against the Core 2 Duo E4300's 1,005 — a 0.3% lead for the Core 2 Duo E4300. L3 cache: 3 MB on the Core i5-540UM vs 0 kB on the Core 2 Duo E4300.

FeatureCore i5-540UMCore 2 Duo E4300
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2 GHz+11%
1.8 GHz
Base Clock
1.2 GHz
1.8 GHz+50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
0 kB
L2 Cache
512 kB
2 MB+300%
Process
32 nm-51%
65 nm
Architecture
Arrandale (2010−2011)
Allendale (2006−2009)
PassMark
1,002
1,005
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-540UM uses the BGA1288 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core 2 Duo E4300 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to 800 memory speed. The Core 2 Duo E4300 supports up to 16 of RAM compared to 8 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: HM55,HM57,QM57,QS57 (Core i5-540UM) and P35,G31,G33,P45 (Core 2 Duo E4300).

FeatureCore i5-540UMCore 2 Duo E4300
Socket
BGA1288
LGA775
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0+82%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
800
800
Max RAM Capacity
8
16+100%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (Core i5-540UM) vs false (Core 2 Duo E4300). The Core i5-540UM includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Ironlake)), while the Core 2 Duo E4300 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i5-540UM rivals Core 2 Duo SU9400; Core 2 Duo E4300 rivals Athlon 64 X2 3800+.

FeatureCore i5-540UMCore 2 Duo E4300
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics (Ironlake)
None
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
true
false