Core i5-560UM
VS
Pentium B950

Core i5-560UM vs Pentium B950

Intel

Core i5-560UM

2 Cores4 Thrd18 WWMax: 2.13 GHz2010
VS
Intel

Pentium B950

2 Cores2 Thrd35 WWMax: 2.1 GHz2011

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i5-560UM is positioned at rank 1224 and the Pentium B950 is on rank 1142, so the Pentium B950 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-560UM

#1212
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
7227%
#1213
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
7121%
#1214
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
6537%
#1215
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
6507%
#1216
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
6448%
#1218
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
6227%
#1219
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
5970%
#1220
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
5961%
#1221
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
5800%
#1224
Core i5-560UM
MSRP: $250|Avg: N/A
100%
#1225
Core i7-660UM
MSRP: $317|Avg: N/A
99%
#1226
C-30
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
99%
#1228
Core i7-620UM
MSRP: $278|Avg: N/A
97%
#1230
Celeron 570
MSRP: $134|Avg: $15
93%
#1231
Core i7-820QM
MSRP: $546|Avg: N/A
82%
#1233
Core Duo T2700
MSRP: $663|Avg: N/A
69%
#1235
Pentium SU4100
MSRP: $289|Avg: $15
58%
#1236
Core Solo T1400
MSRP: $200|Avg: $5
53%
#1237
Core i7-940XM
MSRP: $1096|Avg: N/A
51%
#1238
Core Solo T1350
MSRP: $200|Avg: $70
50%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium B950

#1130
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
3845%
#1131
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
3789%
#1132
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
3478%
#1133
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
3463%
#1134
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
3431%
#1136
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
3313%
#1137
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
3177%
#1138
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
3172%
#1139
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
3087%
#1142
Pentium B950
MSRP: $134|Avg: $35
100%
#1143
Celeron 220
MSRP: $42|Avg: $42
100%
#1144
Pentium B960
MSRP: $134|Avg: $15
100%
#1146
Pentium 957
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
99%
#1147
Core 2 Duo SL9400
MSRP: $284|Avg: N/A
99%
#1149
Pentium N3540
MSRP: $161|Avg: $161
98%
#1150
Core i7-3555LE
MSRP: $300|Avg: $280
98%
#1151
Core i3-2377M
MSRP: $250|Avg: N/A
97%
#1152
Core 2 Duo E8435
MSRP: $150|Avg: $74
96%
#1153
Celeron M 723
MSRP: $161|Avg: $161
96%
#1154
Core M-5Y51
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
95%
#1155
Core i7-3517UE
MSRP: $330|Avg: $35
95%
#1156
Pentium N3530
MSRP: $161|Avg: $20
94%
#1157
Core i3-330E
MSRP: $177|Avg: $89
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Core i5-560UM leads in gaming performance. However, the Pentium B950 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.7% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCore i5-560UMPentium B950
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($250)
More affordable ($35)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Arrandale (2010−2011) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Efficiency: Even within a comparison of older hardware, the Pentium B950 stands out as the superior choice. It is effectively 86% cheaper ($35 vs $250) while identifying as the stronger performer.
InsightCore i5-560UMPentium B950
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+619%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($250)
More affordable ($35)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-560UM and Pentium B950

Intel

Core i5-560UM

The Core i5-560UM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 26 September 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.33 GHz, with boost up to 2.13 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1288. Thermal design power (TDP): 18 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,015 points. Launch price was $250.

Intel

Pentium B950

The Pentium B950 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 June 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.1 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,022 points. Launch price was $134.

Processing Power

The Core i5-560UM packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Pentium B950's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.13 GHz on the Core i5-560UM versus 2.1 GHz on the Pentium B950 — a 1.4% clock advantage for the Core i5-560UM (base: 1.33 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Core i5-560UM uses the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture (32 nm), while the Pentium B950 uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-560UM scores 1,015 against the Pentium B950's 1,022 — a 0.7% lead for the Pentium B950. L3 cache: 3 MB on the Core i5-560UM vs 2 MB (total) on the Pentium B950.

FeatureCore i5-560UMPentium B950
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.13 GHz+1%
2.1 GHz
Base Clock
1.33 GHz
2.1 GHz+58%
L3 Cache
3 MB+50%
2 MB (total)
L2 Cache
512 kB+100%
256K (per core)
Process
32 nm
32 nm
Architecture
Arrandale (2010−2011)
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark
1,015
1,022
Geekbench 6 Single
379
Geekbench 6 Multi
671
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-560UM uses the BGA1288 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium B950 uses PGA988 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 800 on the Core i5-560UM versus DDR3-1333 on the Pentium B950 — the Core i5-560UM supports 198.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Pentium B950 supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: HM55,HM57,QM57,QS57 (Core i5-560UM) and HM65,HM67 (Pentium B950).

FeatureCore i5-560UMPentium B950
Socket
BGA1288
PGA988
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
800+26567%
DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity
8
16 GB+209715100%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (Core i5-560UM) vs VT-x (Pentium B950). Both include integrated graphics Intel HD Graphics (Ironlake) (Core i5-560UM) and Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) (Pentium B950) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Pentium B950 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core i5-560UM rivals Core 2 Duo SU9400.

FeatureCore i5-560UMPentium B950
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics (Ironlake)
Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
true
VT-x
Target Use
Budget
💰

Value Analysis

The Core i5-560UM launched at $250 MSRP, while the Pentium B950 debuted at $134.

FeatureCore i5-560UMPentium B950
MSRP
$250
$134-46%
Avg Price (30d)
$35
Release Date
2010
2011