
Core i5-560UM

Pentium J2850
Core i5-560UM vs Pentium J2850 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-560UM vs Pentium J2850 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-560UM vs Pentium J2850: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-560UM
2010Why buy it
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (3 MB vs 2 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics (Ironlake), while Pentium J2850 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,015 vs 1,016).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 4.1 vs 10.8 PassMark/$ ($250 MSRP vs $94 MSRP).
- ❌800% higher power demand at 18W vs 2W.
Pentium J2850
2013Why buy it
- ✅Costs $156 less on MSRP ($94 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 166.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 10.8 vs 4.1 PassMark/$ ($94 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 2W instead of 18W, a 16W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 3 MB).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-560UM can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Pentium J2850 better than Core i5-560UM?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-560UM vs Pentium J2850 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-560UM
The Core i5-560UM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 26 September 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.33 GHz, with boost up to 2.13 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1288. Thermal design power (TDP): 18 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,015 points. Launch price was $250.

Pentium J2850
The Pentium J2850 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-D (2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.41 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,016 points. Launch price was $94.
Processing Power
The Core i5-560UM packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Pentium J2850 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Pentium J2850 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.13 GHz on the Core i5-560UM versus 2.4 GHz on the Pentium J2850 — a 11.9% clock advantage for the Pentium J2850 (base: 1.33 GHz vs 2.41 GHz). The Core i5-560UM uses the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture (32 nm), while the Pentium J2850 uses Bay Trail-D (2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-560UM scores 1,015 against the Pentium J2850's 1,016 — a 0.1% lead for the Pentium J2850. L3 cache: 3 MB on the Core i5-560UM vs 2 MB L2 Cache on the Pentium J2850.
| Feature | Core i5-560UM | Pentium J2850 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 4 / 4+100% |
| Boost Clock | 2.13 GHz | 2.4 GHz+13% |
| Base Clock | 1.33 GHz | 2.41 GHz+81% |
| L3 Cache | 3 MB+50% | 2 MB L2 Cache |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB | 2 MB+300% |
| Process | 32 nm | 22 nm-31% |
| Architecture | Arrandale (2010−2011) | Bay Trail-D (2013) |
| PassMark | 1,015 | 1,016 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-560UM uses the BGA1288 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium J2850 uses FCBGA1170 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-560UM | Pentium J2850 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | BGA1288 | FCBGA1170 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 800 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 8 | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: true (Core i5-560UM) / not specified (Pentium J2850). The Core i5-560UM includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Ironlake)), while the Pentium J2850 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i5-560UM rivals Core 2 Duo SU9400.
| Feature | Core i5-560UM | Pentium J2850 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Intel HD Graphics (Ironlake) | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | true | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i5-560UM was priced at $250, while the Pentium J2850 came in at $94. On launch pricing ($250 vs $94), Pentium J2850 was $156 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-560UM delivers 4.1 pts/$ vs 10.8 pts/$ for the Pentium J2850 — making the Pentium J2850 the 90.8% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-560UM | Pentium J2850 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $250 | $94-62% |
| Performance per Dollar | 4.1 | 10.8+163% |
| Release Date | 2010 | 2013 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














