
Core i5-7260U

Ryzen 7 3700X
Core i5-7260U vs Ryzen 7 3700X Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-7260U vs Ryzen 7 3700X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-7260U vs Ryzen 7 3700X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-7260U
2017Why buy it
- β Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.
- β Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Plus Graphics 640, while Ryzen 7 3700X needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (3,953 vs 22,430).
- βSmaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 32 MB).
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +236.5% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β +700% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 4 MB).
- β 100% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 12) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- βLaunch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while Core i5-7260U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- β333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.
- βNo integrated graphics, while Core i5-7260U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 3700X better than Core i5-7260U?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-7260U vs Ryzen 7 3700X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-7260U
The Core i5-7260U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016β2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 3,953 points. Launch price was $304.


Ryzen 7 3700X
The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019β2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.
Processing Power
The Core i5-7260U packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Ryzen 7 3700X offers 8 cores / 16 threads β the Ryzen 7 3700X has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Core i5-7260U versus 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X β a 25.6% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 3700X (base: 2.2 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Core i5-7260U uses the Kaby Lake (2016β2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 7 3700X uses Matisse (Zen 2) (2019β2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-7260U scores 3,953 against the Ryzen 7 3700X's 22,430 β a 140.1% lead for the Ryzen 7 3700X. L3 cache: 4 MB on the Core i5-7260U vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X.
| Feature | Core i5-7260U | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 8 / 16+300% |
| Boost Clock | 3.4 GHz | 4.4 GHz+29% |
| Base Clock | 2.2 GHz | 3.6 GHz+64% |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB | 32 MB+700% |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Kaby Lake (2016β2019) | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019β2020) |
| PassMark | 3,953 | 22,430+467% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,192 | β |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-7260U uses the BGA1356 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 7 3700X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2133 on the Core i5-7260U versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 3700X β the Ryzen 7 3700X supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 7 3700X supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB β 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 12 (Core i5-7260U) vs 24 (Ryzen 7 3700X) β the Ryzen 7 3700X offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Kaby Lake-U (Core i5-7260U) and AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 7 3700X).
| Feature | Core i5-7260U | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | BGA1356 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2133 | DDR4-3200+50% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | 128 GB+300% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 12 | 24+100% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-7260U) / not specified (Ryzen 7 3700X). The Core i5-7260U includes integrated graphics (Iris Plus Graphics 640), while the Ryzen 7 3700X requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-7260U targets Mainstream Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i5-7260U rivals A12-9720P.
| Feature | Core i5-7260U | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Iris Plus Graphics 640 | β |
| Unlocked | No | β |
| AVX-512 | No | β |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | β |
| Target Use | Mainstream Laptop | β |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













