PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-7400T vs Xeon L5640 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-7400T vs Xeon L5640: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-7400T

2017

Why buy it

✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
✅Costs $814 less on MSRP ($182 MSRP vs $996 MSRP).
✅Delivers 451.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 25.8 vs 4.7 PassMark/$ ($182 MSRP vs $996 MSRP).
✅Draws 35W instead of 60W, a 25W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon L5640 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 12 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon L5640, which brings 6 cores / 12 threads.

Xeon L5640

2010

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +11.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 6 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 6 cores / 12 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (4,659 vs 4,692).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 4.7 vs 25.8 PassMark/$ ($996 MSRP vs $182 MSRP).
❌71.4% higher power demand at 60W vs 35W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-7400T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-7400T.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-7400T better than Xeon L5640?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon L5640 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-7400T is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-7400T is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-7400T is the better buy right now. Core i5-7400T comes in $814 cheaper on MSRP at $182 MSRP versus $996 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.7% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon L5640 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 11.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 451.1% better value on MSRP (25.8 vs 4.7 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-7400T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2010) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 6/12. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i5-7400T vs Xeon L5640 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-7400T

The Core i5-7400T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 4,692 points. Launch price was $187.

Xeon L5640

The Xeon L5640 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 March 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Westmere-EP (2010−2011) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.26 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 60 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,659 points. Launch price was $200.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-7400T packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Xeon L5640 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Xeon L5640 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the Core i5-7400T versus 2.8 GHz on the Xeon L5640 — a 6.9% clock advantage for the Core i5-7400T (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2.26 GHz). The Core i5-7400T uses the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon L5640 uses Westmere-EP (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-7400T scores 4,692 against the Xeon L5640's 4,659 — a 0.7% lead for the Core i5-7400T. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i5-7400T vs 12 MB (total) on the Xeon L5640.

Feature	Core i5-7400T	Xeon L5640
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	6 / 12+50%
Boost Clock	3 GHz+7%	2.8 GHz
Base Clock	2.4 GHz+6%	2.26 GHz
L3 Cache	6 MB (total)	12 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	256 kB (per core)
Process	14 nm-56%	32 nm
Architecture	Kaby Lake (2016−2019)	Westmere-EP (2010−2011)
PassMark	4,692	4,659
Cinebench R23 Multi	3,334	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,069	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	2,463	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-7400T uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon L5640 uses LGA1366 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2400 on the Core i5-7400T versus DDR3 1333 MHz on the Xeon L5640 — the Core i5-7400T supports 80% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon L5640 supports up to 288 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 350% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i5-7400T) vs 3 (Xeon L5640). PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i5-7400T) vs 0 (Xeon L5640) — the Core i5-7400T offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: B150,Q170,B250,Q250,H110,Q270,H170,Z170,H270,Z270 (Core i5-7400T) and Intel 5520,Intel X58 (Xeon L5640).

Feature	Core i5-7400T	Xeon L5640
Socket	LGA1151	LGA1366
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 5.0+67%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2400+80%	DDR3 1333 MHz
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	288 GB+350%
RAM Channels	2	3+50%
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: Yes (Core i5-7400T) vs true (Xeon L5640). The Core i5-7400T includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 630), while the Xeon L5640 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Xeon L5640 targets Server Low Power.

Feature	Core i5-7400T	Xeon L5640
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	Intel HD Graphics 630	—
Unlocked	—	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	Yes	true
Target Use	—	Server Low Power

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i5-7400T was priced at $182, while the Xeon L5640 came in at $996. On launch pricing ($182 vs $996), Core i5-7400T was $814 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-7400T delivers 25.8 pts/$ vs 4.7 pts/$ for the Xeon L5640 — making the Core i5-7400T the 138.6% better value option.

Feature	Core i5-7400T	Xeon L5640
MSRP	$182-82%	$996
Performance per Dollar	25.8+449%	4.7
Release Date	2017	2010

Search Core i5-7400T on Amazon

Search Xeon L5640 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.