
Core i5-750 vs Core 2 Duo T7700

Core i5-750

Core 2 Duo T7700
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i5-750 is positioned at rank 960 and the Core 2 Duo T7700 is on rank 484, so the Core 2 Duo T7700 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core i5-750
Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo T7700
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core i5-750 | Core 2 Duo T7700 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($30) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Lynnfield (2009−2010) / 45 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Merom (2006−2008) / 65 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core i5-750 | Core 2 Duo T7700 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($30) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-750 and Core 2 Duo T7700

Core i5-750
The Core i5-750 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 September 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Lynnfield (2009−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.66 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1156. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,546 points. Launch price was $150.

Core 2 Duo T7700
The Core 2 Duo T7700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 September 2007 (18 years ago). It is based on the Merom (2006−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 2,554 points. Launch price was $307.
Processing Power
The Core i5-750 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core 2 Duo T7700 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Core i5-750 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Core i5-750 versus 2.4 GHz on the Core 2 Duo T7700 — a 28.6% clock advantage for the Core i5-750 (base: 2.66 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Core i5-750 uses the Lynnfield (2009−2010) architecture (45 nm), while the Core 2 Duo T7700 uses Merom (2006−2008) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-750 scores 2,546 against the Core 2 Duo T7700's 2,554 — a 0.3% lead for the Core 2 Duo T7700. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 424 vs 254, a 50.1% lead for the Core i5-750 that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i5-750 vs 0 kB on the Core 2 Duo T7700.
| Feature | Core i5-750 | Core 2 Duo T7700 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4+100% | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 3.2 GHz+33% | 2.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.66 GHz+11% | 2.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total) | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 4 MB+1500% |
| Process | 45 nm-31% | 65 nm |
| Architecture | Lynnfield (2009−2010) | Merom (2006−2008) |
| PassMark | 2,546 | 2,554 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 424+67% | 254 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-750 uses the LGA1156 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core 2 Duo T7700 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the Core i5-750 versus DDR2-667 on the Core 2 Duo T7700 — the Core i5-750 supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-750 supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: P55,H55,H57,Q57 (Core i5-750) and GL960,GME965,GM965,PM965 (Core 2 Duo T7700).
| Feature | Core i5-750 | Core 2 Duo T7700 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1156 | PGA478 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0+82% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1333+50% | DDR2-667 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB+300% | 4 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-750) vs VT-x (Core 2 Duo T7700). Primary use case: Core i5-750 targets Legacy Desktop, Core 2 Duo T7700 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core i5-750 rivals Phenom II X4 965; Core 2 Duo T7700 rivals Athlon 64 X2 5000+.
| Feature | Core i5-750 | Core 2 Duo T7700 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | — |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | VT-x |
| Target Use | Legacy Desktop | Budget |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















