
Core i5-750 vs Core i5-3230M

Core i5-750

Core i5-3230M
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i5-750 is positioned at rank 960 and the Core i5-3230M is on rank 30, so the Core i5-3230M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core i5-750
Performance Per Dollar Core i5-3230M
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core i5-750 | Core i5-3230M |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($30) | ✅ More affordable ($13) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Lynnfield (2009−2010) / 45 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core i5-750 | Core i5-3230M |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+132%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($30) | ✅ More affordable ($13) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-750 and Core i5-3230M

Core i5-750
The Core i5-750 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 September 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Lynnfield (2009−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.66 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1156. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,546 points. Launch price was $150.

Core i5-3230M
The Core i5-3230M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,565 points. Launch price was $225.
Processing Power
The Core i5-750 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i5-3230M offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Core i5-750 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Core i5-750 versus 3.2 GHz on the Core i5-3230M — identical boost frequencies (base: 2.66 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Core i5-750 uses the Lynnfield (2009−2010) architecture (45 nm), while the Core i5-3230M uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-750 scores 2,546 against the Core i5-3230M's 2,565 — a 0.7% lead for the Core i5-3230M. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 424 vs 565, a 28.5% lead for the Core i5-3230M that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i5-750 vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i5-3230M.
| Feature | Core i5-750 | Core i5-3230M |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4+100% | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 3.2 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.66 GHz+2% | 2.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total)+167% | 3 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 45 nm | 22 nm-51% |
| Architecture | Lynnfield (2009−2010) | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) |
| PassMark | 2,546 | 2,565 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 424 | 565+33% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 1,128 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-750 uses the LGA1156 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i5-3230M uses BGA1023 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1333 memory speed. The Core i5-3230M supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: P55,H55,H57,Q57 (Core i5-750) and HM76,HM77 (Core i5-3230M).
| Feature | Core i5-750 | Core i5-3230M |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1156 | BGA1023 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 3.0+50% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1333 | DDR3L-1600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | 32 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-750) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-3230M). The Core i5-3230M includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4000), while the Core i5-750 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-750 targets Legacy Desktop, Core i5-3230M targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-750 rivals Phenom II X4 965; Core i5-3230M rivals Ryzen 5 3500U.
| Feature | Core i5-750 | Core i5-3230M |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | None | HD Graphics 4000 |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Legacy Desktop | Gaming |
Value Analysis
The Core i5-750 launched at $210 MSRP, while the Core i5-3230M debuted at $225. At current prices ($30 vs $13), the Core i5-3230M is $17 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-750 delivers 84.9 pts/$ vs 197.3 pts/$ for the Core i5-3230M — making the Core i5-3230M the 79.7% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-750 | Core i5-3230M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $210-7% | $225 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30 | $13-57% |
| Performance per Dollar | 84.9 | 197.3+132% |
| Release Date | 2009 | 2013 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















