
Core i5-750

Pentium G4400
Core i5-750 vs Pentium G4400 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-750 vs Pentium G4400 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-750 vs Pentium G4400: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-750
2009Why buy it
- ✅+166.7% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 3 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Pentium G4400.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Pentium G4400 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (2,546 vs 2,562).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.1 vs 40.0 PassMark/$ ($210 MSRP vs $64 MSRP).
- ❌75.9% higher power demand at 95W vs 54W.
Pentium G4400
2015Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $146 less on MSRP ($64 MSRP vs $210 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 230.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 40.0 vs 12.1 PassMark/$ ($64 MSRP vs $210 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 54W instead of 95W, a 41W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 8 MB).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-750.
Quick Answers
So, is Pentium G4400 better than Core i5-750?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-750 vs Pentium G4400 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-750
The Core i5-750 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 September 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Lynnfield (2009−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.66 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1156. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,546 points. Launch price was $150.

Pentium G4400
The Pentium G4400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 54 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,562 points. Launch price was $64.
Processing Power
The Core i5-750 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Pentium G4400 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Core i5-750 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Core i5-750 versus 3.3 GHz on the Pentium G4400 — a 3.1% clock advantage for the Pentium G4400 (base: 2.66 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Core i5-750 uses the Lynnfield (2009−2010) architecture (45 nm), while the Pentium G4400 uses Skylake (2015−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-750 scores 2,546 against the Pentium G4400's 2,562 — a 0.6% lead for the Pentium G4400. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i5-750 vs 3 MB on the Pentium G4400.
| Feature | Core i5-750 | Pentium G4400 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4+100% | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 3.2 GHz | 3.3 GHz+3% |
| Base Clock | 2.66 GHz | 3.3 GHz+24% |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total)+167% | 3 MB |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 45 nm | 14 nm-69% |
| Architecture | Lynnfield (2009−2010) | Skylake (2015−2016) |
| PassMark | 2,546 | 2,562 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 424 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-750 uses the LGA1156 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium G4400 uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-750 | Pentium G4400 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1156 | LGA1151 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 3.0+50% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1333 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-750) / not specified (Pentium G4400). Primary use case: Core i5-750 targets Legacy Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i5-750 rivals Phenom II X4 965.
| Feature | Core i5-750 | Pentium G4400 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| IGPU Model | None | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | — |
| Target Use | Legacy Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i5-750 was priced at $210, while the Pentium G4400 came in at $64. On launch pricing ($210 vs $64), Pentium G4400 was $146 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-750 delivers 12.1 pts/$ vs 40.0 pts/$ for the Pentium G4400 — making the Pentium G4400 the 107% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-750 | Pentium G4400 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $210 | $64-70% |
| Performance per Dollar | 12.1 | 40.0+231% |
| Release Date | 2009 | 2015 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














